Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36342401›Full record

ArticleGlobal public health2023

Adaptations and staff experiences in delivering parenting programmes and other family support services in three community-based organisations in Cape Town, South Africa during the COVID pandemic.

Yulia Shenderovich, Hlengiwe Sacolo-Gwebu, Zuyi Fang, Jamie Lachman, Lucie Cluver, Catherine Ward

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Modifications of a Parenting Program in the Context of Scaling-Up and Scaling-Out: Documenting Furaha Teens in Tanzania Using FRAME.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Yulia ShenderovichWolfson Centre for Young People's Mental Health, Cardiff, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0254-3397
Hlengiwe Sacolo-GwebuDepartment of Psychology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-6066-4074
Zuyi FangDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8619-0137
Jamie LachmanDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9475-9218
Lucie CluverDepartment of Social Policy and Intervention, Centre for Evidence-Based Intervention, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0418-835X
Catherine WardDepartment of Psychology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8727-4175
University of Cape Town · ZAUniversity of Oxford · GBBeijing Normal University · CN

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU16Chief Scientist Office SPHSU18European Research Council 737476European Research Council 771468Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/3
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explore how organisations working on parenting programmes and other types of family support and violence prevention in low-resource settings experienced the pandemic. In August 2020-May 2021, we interviewed (1) staff from three community-based organisations delivering evidence-informed parenting interventions and other psychosocial services for families in Cape Town, South Africa, (2) staff from a parenting programme training organisation and (3) staff from two international organisations supporting psychosocial services in South Africa. Interviews (22) were thematically analysed, with findings in three areas. First, respondents noted changes in the context, including the job losses, food insecurity, and stress experienced by local communities, and reductions in organisational funding. Second, we found that in response to these context changes, the organisations shifted their focus to food provision and COVID prevention. Parenting and psychosocial programmes were adapted - e.g. by changing the physical delivery settings, reducing group sizes, and taking up digital and phone implementation. Participants reported improved perceptions of remote delivery as a feasible approach for working with families - but internet and phone access remained challenging. Third, the pandemic brought new responsibilities for staff, and both the challenges of working from home and the health risks of in-person work.

Indexed as

COVID-19ParentingCommunity Health ServicesFamily SupportHumansPandemicsSouth AfricachildrenCOVID-19FamiliespandemicparentingSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID36342401
PMCPMC10802685
OpenAlexW4308368582

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.