Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36342372›Full record

ArticleeLife2022

Whole-brain comparison of rodent and human brains using spatial transcriptomics.

Antoine Beauchamp, Yohan Yee, Ben C Darwin, Armin Raznahan, Rogier B Mars, Jason P Lerch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 66 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
66citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

66 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

6 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Antoine BeauchampThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0008-7471
Yohan YeeThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7083-1932
Ben C DarwinThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8689-046X
Armin RaznahanSection on Developmental Neurogenomics, Human Genetics Branch, National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program, Bethesda, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5622-1190
Rogier B Mars *Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain (FMRIB), Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6302-8631
Jason P Lerch *The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAHospital for Sick Children · CANational Institute of Mental Health · JPRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

Coupling neuroimaging with CLARITY and single cell genomics to dissect sex differences in the developing brainR01HD100298 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARNOLD, ARTHUR P, LERCH, JASON P. · 2020 to 2024
$2.2M
CIHR FSS-167844CIHR GSD-165737NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD100298Wellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ever-increasing use of mouse models in preclinical neuroscience research calls for an improvement in the methods used to translate findings between mouse and human brains. Previously, we showed that the brains of primates can be compared in a direct quantitative manner using a common reference space built from white matter tractography data (Mars et al., 2018b). Here, we extend the common space approach to evaluate the similarity of mouse and human brain regions using openly accessible brain-wide transcriptomic data sets. We show that mouse-human homologous genes capture broad patterns of neuroanatomical organization, but the resolution of cross-species correspondences can be improved using a novel supervised machine learning approach. Using this method, we demonstrate that sensorimotor subdivisions of the neocortex exhibit greater similarity between species, compared with supramodal subdivisions, and mouse isocortical regions separate into sensorimotor and supramodal clusters based on their similarity to human cortical regions. We also find that mouse and human striatal regions are strongly conserved, with the mouse caudoputamen exhibiting an equal degree of similarity to both the human caudate and putamen.

Indexed as

RodentiaWhite MatterAnimalsBrainBrain MappingHumansPrimatesTranscriptomecomparative neuroanatomyevolutionary biologyhumanmouseneuroinformaticsneurosciencetranslational neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID36342372
PMCPMC9708081
OpenAlexW4308370378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.