Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36342303›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2023

Numerical and experimental evaluation of low-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound wave propagation using human skulls for brain neuromodulation.

Mengyue Chen, Chang Peng, Huaiyu Wu, Chih-Chung Huang, Taewon Kim, Zachary Traylor, Marie Muller, Pratik Y Chhatbar, Chang S Nam, Wuwei Feng and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The influence of bone model geometries on the determination of skull acoustic properties.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mengyue ChenDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Chang PengDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Huaiyu WuDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Chih-Chung HuangDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Taewon KimDepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Zachary TraylorEdward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Marie MullerDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Pratik Y ChhatbarDepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Chang S NamEdward P. Fitts Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.
Wuwei FengDepartment of Neurology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Xiaoning JiangDepartment of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

American Heart Association 20IPA35360039American Stroke Association 20IPA35360039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow-intensity transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) has gained considerable attention as a promising noninvasive neuromodulatory technique for human brains. However, the complex morphology of the skull hinders scholars from precisely predicting the acoustic energy transmitted and the region of the brain impacted during the sonication. This is due to the fact that different ultrasound frequencies and skull morphology variations greatly affect wave propagation through the skull. PURPOSE: Although the acoustic properties of human skull have been studied for tFUS applications, such as tumor ablation using a multielement phased array, there is no consensus about how to choose a single-element focused ultrasound (FUS) transducer with a suitable frequency for neuromodulation. There are interests in exploring the magnitude and dimension of tFUS beam through human parietal bone for modulating specific brain lobes. Herein, we aim to investigate the wave propagation of tFUS on human skulls to understand and address the concerns above.

methodsBoth experimental measurements and numerical modeling were conducted to investigate the transmission efficiency and beam pattern of tFUS on five human skulls (C3 and C4 regions) using single-element FUS transducers with six different frequencies (150-1500 kHz). The degassed skull was placed in a water tank, and a calibrated hydrophone was utilized to measure acoustic pressure past it. The cranial computed tomography scan data of each skull were obtained to derive a high-resolution acoustic model (grid point spacing: 0.25 mm) in simulations. Meanwhile, we modified the power-law exponent of acoustic attenuation coefficient to validate numerical modeling and enabled it to be served as a prediction tool, based on the experimental measurements.

resultsThe transmission efficiency and -6 dB beamwidth were evaluated and compared for various frequencies. An exponential decrease in transmission efficiency and a logarithmic decrease of -6 dB beamwidth with an increase in ultrasound frequency were observed. It is found that a >750 kHz ultrasound leads to a relatively lower tFUS transmission efficiency (<5%), whereas a <350 kHz ultrasound contributes to a relatively broader beamwidth (>5 mm). Based on these observations, we further analyzed the dependence of tFUS wave propagation on FUS transducer aperture size.

conclusionsWe successfully studied tFUS wave propagation through human skulls at different frequencies experimentally and numerically. The findings have important implications to predict tFUS wave propagation for ultrasound neuromodulation in clinical applications, and guide researchers to develop advanced ultrasound transducers as neural interfaces.

Indexed as

BrainSkullHeadHumansTransducersUltrasonic WavesUltrasonographyhuman skulltranscranial focused ultrasoundultrasonic neuromodulationultrasound transducer

Identifiers

PMID36342303
PMCPMC10099743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.