Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36342291›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal2023

Electrocardiogram-based deep learning improves outcome prediction following cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Philippe C Wouters, Rutger R van de Leur, Melle B Vessies, Antonius M W van Stipdonk, Mohammed A Ghossein, Rutger J Hassink, Pieter A Doevendans, Pim van der Harst, Alexander H Maass, Frits W Prinzen and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Artificial intelligence in heart failure.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Philippe C WoutersDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3406-4083
Rutger R van de LeurDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-4779-5870
Melle B VessiesDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6464-038X
Antonius M W van StipdonkDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6621-0727
Mohammed A GhosseinDepartment of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2359-8167
Rutger J HassinkDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0237-7867
Pieter A DoevendansDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6257-7169
Pim van der HarstDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2713-686X
Alexander H MaassDepartment of Cardiology, Thoraxcentre, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7936-360X
Frits W PrinzenDepartment of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8917-9032
Kevin VernooyDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8818-5964
Mathias MeineDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1102-2155
René van EsDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9950-4388
Heidelberg University · DEMaastricht University · NLMaastricht University Medical Centre · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NL

Funding

Centre for Translational 01C-203Centre for Translational Molecular Medicine 01C-203Dutch Heart FoundationDutch Heart Foundation no. 2019B011Health Research ZonMw, no. 104021004Netherlands OrganisationNetherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development 104021004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study aims to identify and visualize electrocardiogram (ECG) features using an explainable deep learning-based algorithm to predict cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcome. Its performance is compared with current guideline ECG criteria and QRSAREA. METHODS AND

resultsA deep learning algorithm, trained on 1.1 million ECGs from 251 473 patients, was used to compress the median beat ECG, thereby summarizing most ECG features into only 21 explainable factors (FactorECG). Pre-implantation ECGs of 1306 CRT patients from three academic centres were converted into their respective FactorECG. FactorECG predicted the combined clinical endpoint of death, left ventricular assist device, or heart transplantation [c-statistic 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66-0.72], significantly outperforming QRSAREA and guideline ECG criteria [c-statistic 0.61 (95% CI 0.58-0.64) and 0.57 (95% CI 0.54-0.60), P < 0.001 for both]. The addition of 13 clinical variables was of limited added value for the FactorECG model when compared with QRSAREA (Δ c-statistic 0.03 vs. 0.10). FactorECG identified inferolateral T-wave inversion, smaller right precordial S- and T-wave amplitude, ventricular rate, and increased PR interval and P-wave duration to be important predictors for poor outcome. An online visualization tool was created to provide interactive visualizations (https://crt.ecgx.ai).

conclusionRequiring only a standard 12-lead ECG, FactorECG held superior discriminative ability for the prediction of clinical outcome when compared with guideline criteria and QRSAREA, without requiring additional clinical variables. End-to-end automated visualization of ECG features allows for an explainable algorithm, which may facilitate rapid uptake of this personalized decision-making tool in CRT.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyDeep LearningHeart FailureArrhythmias, CardiacElectrocardiographyHumansTreatment OutcomeCardiac resynchronization therapyDeep learningElectrocardiogramExplainableHeart failureQRS area

Identifiers

PMID36342291
PMCPMC9940988
OpenAlexW4308371576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.