ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
Vaeda computationally annotates doublets in single-cell RNA sequencing data.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coordinated dysregulation of modular gene activity in human neuropathologies.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence Revolution in Transcriptomics: From Single Cells to Spatial Atlases.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Why "Where" Matters as Much as "How Much": Single-Cell and Spatial Transcriptomics in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- OmniDoublet: a method for doublet detection in multimodal single-cell sequencing data.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- A unified model-based framework for doublet or multiplet detection in single-cell multiomics data.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationSingle-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) continues to expand our knowledge by facilitating the study of transcriptional heterogeneity at the level of single cells. Despite this technology's utility and success in biomedical research, technical artifacts are present in scRNA-seq data. Doublets/multiplets are a type of artifact that occurs when two or more cells are tagged by the same barcode, and therefore they appear as a single cell. Because this introduces non-existent transcriptional profiles, doublets can bias and mislead downstream analysis. To address this limitation, computational methods to annotate and remove doublets form scRNA-seq datasets are needed.
resultsWe introduce vaeda (Variational Auto-Encoder for Doublet Annotation), a new approach for computational annotation of doublets in scRNA-seq data. Vaeda integrates a variational auto-encoder and Positive-Unlabeled learning to produce doublet scores and binary doublet calls. We apply vaeda, along with seven existing doublet annotation methods, to 16 benchmark datasets and find that vaeda performs competitively in terms of doublet scores and doublet calls. Notably, vaeda outperforms other python-based methods for doublet annotation. Altogether, vaeda is a robust and competitive method for scRNA-seq doublet annotation and may be of particular interest in the context of python-based workflows. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Vaeda is available at https://github.com/kostkalab/vaeda, and the version used for the results we present here is archived at zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7199783). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.