Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36342169›Full record

SynthesisObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2023

Consumer willingness to pay for healthier food products: A systematic review.

Moosa Alsubhi, Miranda Blake, Tan Nguyen, Ishani Majmudar, Marj Moodie, Jaithri Ananthapavan

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
21.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Consumer willingness to pay for healthier food products: A systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Valorization of Tomato (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  8. Private Practice Dietetics Workforce Development: What 45 Thought Leaders Agree On.Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Production of Low-Fat Mayonnaise WithFood science & nutrition · 2025
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Moosa AlsubhiDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5204-0651
Miranda BlakeGlobal Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0649-2320
Tan NguyenDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9986-7629
Ishani MajmudarDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2059-4857
Marj MoodieDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6890-5250
Jaithri AnanthapavanDeakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, 3125, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5957-6931
Deakin University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food retail strategies to improve the healthiness of food and beverage options may increase purchasing of healthier options and improve diets. Consumer demand for healthier options is an important determinant of the successful implementation and maintenance of healthy food retail interventions. A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature was undertaken to explore whether consumers are willing to pay more for healthier foods and to determine the key factors that influence willingness to pay. Fifteen studies reported the results of 26 experiments providing willingness to pay estimates for healthier food products across a range of food retail environments. Twenty three out of the 26 experiments included in this review (88.5%) found consumers would pay a 5.6% to 91.5% (mean 30.7%) price premium for healthier foods. Studies consistently found a positive willingness to pay for foods with reduced fat and wholegrains with additional fruit and vegetables, while willingness to pay for foods with reduced salt or a combination of low fat and sugar, or salt showed mixed results. Adults over 60 years, females, those living with obesity, and consumers who aim to maintain a healthy lifestyle were more likely to pay a price premium for healthier food, whereas younger consumers, consumers with healthy weight, and consumers with higher levels of education were less likely to pay higher prices. The results of this review contribute to our understanding of consumer preferences for healthier products and provide information to retailers on consumer surplus (benefits) associated with the provision of healthier food alternatives.

Indexed as

Consumer BehaviorFood LabelingAdultBeveragesFemaleFood PreferencesHumansVegetablesdietary guidelineshealthy food retailhealthy interventionswillingness to pay

Identifiers

PMID36342169
PMCPMC10909406
OpenAlexW4308338903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.