Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36341380›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2022

Harmonization and qualification of intracellular cytokine staining to measure influenza-specific CD4

Sarah Begue, Gwenn Waerlop, Bruno Salaun, Michel Janssens, Duncan Bellamy, Rebecca Jane Cox, Richard Davies, Elena Gianchecchi, Donata Medaglini, Emanuele Montomoli and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination elicits the expansion of CD16The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sarah BegueResearch Global Immunology, Sanofi, Marcy L'Etoile, France.
Gwenn WaerlopCenter for Vaccinology (CEVAC), Ghent University and University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Bruno SalaunGlaxoSmithKline, Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Rixensart, Belgium.
Michel JanssensGlaxoSmithKline, Clinical Laboratory Sciences, Rixensart, Belgium.
Duncan BellamyThe Jenner Institute Laboratories, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rebecca Jane CoxInfluenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Richard DaviesInfluenza Centre, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Elena GianchecchiVisMederi, Siena, Italy.
Donata MedagliniLaboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology (LA.M.M.B.), Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Emanuele MontomoliVisMederi, Siena, Italy.
Elena PettiniLaboratory of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology (LA.M.M.B.), Department of Medical Biotechnologies, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Geert Leroux-RoelsCenter for Vaccinology (CEVAC), Ghent University and University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Frédéric ClementCenter for Vaccinology (CEVAC), Ghent University and University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
Anke PagnonResearch Global Immunology, Sanofi, Marcy L'Etoile, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the knowledge that cell-mediated immunity (CMI) contributes to the reduction of severe influenza infection, transmission, and disease outcome, the correlates of protection for cell-mediated immunity remain still unclear. Therefore, measuring the magnitude and quality of influenza-specific T cell responses in a harmonized way is of utmost importance to improve characterisation of vaccine-induced immunity across different clinical trials. The present study, conducted as part of the FLUCOP project, describes the development of a consensus protocol for the intracellular cytokine staining (ICS) assay, in order to reduce inter-laboratory variability, and its qualification. In order to develop a consensus protocol, the study was divided into different stages. Firstly, two pilot studies evaluated critical parameters in the analytical (read-outs) and post-analytical (gating strategies and data analysis) methods applied by eight different laboratories within the FLUCOP consortium. The methods were then harmonized by fixing the critical parameters and the subsequent consensus protocol was then qualified by one FLUCOP member. The antigen-specific cell population was defined as polypositive CD4

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesAntigensCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCytokinesHumansStaining and LabelingT-LymphocytesAntigensCytokinesInfluenza Vaccinescell-mediated immunityFLUCOPinfluenza vaccineintracellular cytokine stainingpolypositive T cellsqualificationstandard operating procedure

Identifiers

PMID36341380
PMCPMC9632653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.