ArticleJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada2020
Article in Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Pathogenicity ofMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Whole genome sequencing of ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant, XDRFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- In silico analysis of hypothetical proteins in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAC1: Structural and functional insights.Journal, genetic engineering & biotechnology · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Methods: ICU patients with PA were identified and classified as colonized or infected. Infected patients were reviewed for source, patient characteristics, antimicrobial susceptibilities, appropriateness of empiric antimicrobial therapy, and 30-day mortality. Independent predictors of mortality were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Results: One hundred forty (71%) patients with PA were infected. Mean patient age was 55 (SD 18) years; 62% were male. Admission categories included medical (71%), surgical (20%), and trauma or neurological (9%). Mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score was 19 (SD 10). One hundred twenty-six (90%) patients were mechanically ventilated, 102 (73%) required vasopressors, and 27 (19%) received renal replacement; 32 (23%) died within 30 days. Infection was nosocomial in 101 (72%) cases. Sources were respiratory (66%), skin-soft tissue (11%), urinary (10%), blood (5%), surgical (5%), gastrointestinal (2%), or unknown (1%). Twenty (14%) isolates were multi-drug resistant; 6 (4%) were extensively drug resistant. Empiric antimicrobial therapy was effective in 97 (69%) cases. Liver disease (adjusted OR [aOR] 6.2, 95% CI 1.5 to 25.7; Conclusions: PA infection in ICU is most commonly respiratory and associated with substantial mortality. Existing malignancy, liver disease, and higher APACHE II score were independently associated with mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.