ReviewFrontiers in neurology2022
The feasibility and accuracy of machine learning in improving safety and efficiency of thrombolysis for patients with stroke: Literature review and proposed improvements.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute stroke CDS: automatic retrieval of thrombolysis contraindications from unstructured clinical letters.Frontiers in digital health · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the treatment of ischemic stroke, timely and efficient recanalization of occluded brain arteries can successfully salvage the ischemic brain. Thrombolysis is the first-line treatment for ischemic stroke. Machine learning models have the potential to select patients who could benefit the most from thrombolysis. In this study, we identified 29 related previous machine learning models, reviewed the models on the accuracy and feasibility, and proposed corresponding improvements. Regarding accuracy, lack of long-term outcome, treatment option consideration, and advanced radiological features were found in many previous studies in terms of model conceptualization. Regarding interpretability, most of the previous models chose restrictive models for high interpretability and did not mention processing time consideration. In the future, model conceptualization could be improved based on comprehensive neurological domain knowledge and feasibility needs to be achieved by elaborate computer science algorithms to increase the interpretability of flexible algorithms and shorten the processing time of the pipeline interpreting medical images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.