Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36341106›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neurology2022

Outcomes after endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke patients with active cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Linyan Duan, Zhaolin Fu, Hengxiao Zhao, Chengyu Song, Qiuyue Tian, Adam A Dmytriw, Robert W Regenhardt, Ziyi Sun, Xiaofan Guo, Xue Wang and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Long-term outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy in acute ischaemic stroke patients with concomitant malignancy.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Linyan DuanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhaolin FuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hengxiao ZhaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Chengyu SongDepartment of Library, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qiuyue TianBeijing Key Laboratory of Clinical Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Adam A DmytriwNeuroendovascular Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Robert W RegenhardtNeuroendovascular Program, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Ziyi SunDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaofan GuoDepartment of Neurology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, United States.
Xue WangDepartment of Library, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Bin YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University · CNHarvard University · USLoma Linda University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Active cancer (AC) is a known risk factor for stroke and a common comorbidity among patients being considered for treatment with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the current evidence for the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of EVT for patients with AC. Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies which met the inclusion criteria for EVT in patients with AC. Studies were excluded due to the mismatch of data format, article type, and group design. The risk of bias was assessed through different scales according to the study design. Results: A total of six studies and 3,657 patients were included. Compared to without active cancer (WC) patients, patients with AC had a significantly higher proportion of in-hospital mortality (OR 3.24; 95% CI, 1.03-10.15). The estimated rate of favorable outcome of six studies was lower in patients with AC than in patients with WC (OR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.35-0.65). For 90-day mortality of four studies, the AC group had a higher proportion when compared with the WC group (OR 3.87; 95% CI, 2.64-5.68). There was no difference between rate of six studies of successful recanalization (OR 1.24; 95% CI, 0.90-1.72) and four studies of symptomatic ICH (OR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.61-1.97) comparing AC and WC. Conclusion: Patients with AC are less likely to have a favorable outcome and have a higher risk of mortality after EVT. Further studies are warranted for this unique patient population.

Indexed as

active canceracute ischemic strokeendovascular thrombectomymeta-analysissystematic review

Identifiers

PMID36341106
PMCPMC9631814
OpenAlexW4306871300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.