Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36341105›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022

Anatomical labeling of intracranial arteries with deep learning in patients with cerebrovascular disease.

Adam Hilbert, Jana Rieger, Vince I Madai, Ela M Akay, Orhun U Aydin, Jonas Behland, Ahmed A Khalil, Ivana Galinovic, Jan Sobesky, Jochen Fiebach and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Graph convolutional networks for automated intracranial artery labeling.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Adam HilbertCharité Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jana RiegerCharité Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Vince I MadaiCharité Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ela M AkayCharité Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Orhun U AydinCharité Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jonas BehlandCharité Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ahmed A KhalilCentre for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Ivana GalinovicCentre for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jan SobeskyCentre for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jochen FiebachCentre for Stroke Research Berlin, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Michelle LivneCharité Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Dietmar FreyCharité Lab for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEJohanna-Etienne-Krankenhaus · DEMax Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain arteries are routinely imaged in the clinical setting by various modalities, e.g., time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA). These imaging techniques have great potential for the diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease, disease progression, and response to treatment. Currently, however, only qualitative assessment is implemented in clinical applications, relying on visual inspection. While manual or semi-automated approaches for quantification exist, such solutions are impractical in the clinical setting as they are time-consuming, involve too many processing steps, and/or neglect image intensity information. In this study, we present a deep learning-based solution for the anatomical labeling of intracranial arteries that utilizes complete information from 3D TOF-MRA images. We adapted and trained a state-of-the-art multi-scale Unet architecture using imaging data of 242 patients with cerebrovascular disease to distinguish 24 arterial segments. The proposed model utilizes vessel-specific information as well as raw image intensity information, and can thus take tissue characteristics into account. Our method yielded a performance of 0.89 macro F1 and 0.90 balanced class accuracy (bAcc) in labeling aggregated segments and 0.80 macro F1 and 0.83 bAcc in labeling detailed arterial segments on average. In particular, a higher F1 score than 0.75 for most arteries of clinical interest for cerebrovascular disease was achieved, with higher than 0.90 F1 scores in the larger, main arteries. Due to minimal pre-processing, simple usability, and fast predictions, our method could be highly applicable in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

anatomical labelingcerebrovasculardeep learningintracranial arteriesstrokeUNET

Identifiers

PMID36341105
PMCPMC9634733
OpenAlexW4306386044

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.