Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36341015›Full record

ArticleJournal of human reproductive sciences

Comparing Progesterone Primed Ovarian Stimulation (PPOS) to GnRH Antagonist Protocol in Oocyte Donation Cycles.

Rupali Khaparde Khurana, Vyshnavi Rao, Chaitra Nayak, Gautham T Pranesh, Kamini A Rao

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human reproductive sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rupali Khaparde KhuranaDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Milann Fertility Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Vyshnavi RaoDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Milann Fertility Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Chaitra NayakDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Milann Fertility Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Gautham T PraneshDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Milann Fertility Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Kamini A RaoDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, Milann Fertility Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Bloom Fertility Centre · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation (PPOS) protocol is based on the principle of preventing pre-mature luteinising hormone surge during ovarian stimulation using progesterone. Aims: In this study, we aimed to compare the cost-effectiveness of PPOS over GnRH antagonist cycles in oocyte donor cycles where freeze all is a norm. Settings and Design: It is a prospective cohort study with 130 participants. Materials and Methods: We included all women undergoing oocyte donation using PPOS protocol and antagonist protocol at our centre. Fifty-seven belonged to the PPOS group and were given medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) and 73 belonged to the GnRH antagonist group who received cetrorelix. The primary outcome was the number of mature oocyte retrieved at OPU and the cost involved per stimulation cycle. Statistical Analysis Used: For normally distributed observations, we used Results: The baseline clinical characteristics of the donors were comparable with a mean age of 25.42 ± 2.90 years, body mass index of 24.00 ± 4.00 kg/m Conclusion: Our study identifies PPOS protocol using MPA to be more cost-effective and patient-friendly than conventional GnRH antagonist protocol in oocyte donor cycles.

Indexed as

Cetrorelixcontrolled ovarian stimulationcost-effective analysismature oocytesmedroxyprogesterone acetateoocyte donationPPOS

Identifiers

PMID36341015
PMCPMC9635379
OpenAlexW4308550374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.