Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340906›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2022

Agarose gel electrophoresis determination of bovine lipoproteins compared with a wet chemistry method.

E Behling-Kelly, C Wong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

E Behling-KellyCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850.
C WongDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138.
Cornell University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantification of serum lipoproteins provides information relative to the overall metabolic health, degree of lipid mobilization, and hepatic function of dairy cattle. Automated assays performed on benchtop chemistry analyzers and commercially available kits use reagents developed for human lipoproteins. The substantial physical and chemical differences between bovine and human lipoproteins potentially confounds the use of these assays in evaluating bovine lipoproteins. In this study, we prospectively analyzed serum lipoproteins from 56 Holstein cows using horizontal slab agarose gel electrophoresis to semi-quantify the high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) fractions by optical densitometry. Ultracentrifugation was used to confirm the electrophoretic separation pattern of the lipoproteins. The values obtained using the electrophoretic method were compared with values obtained by direct measure of HDL cholesterol, total cholesterol, and triglyceride (TG) concentrations on a Roche chemistry analyzer, and calculated LDL cholesterol. Correlation between these methods was poor for HDL (Passing-Bablok regression line: y = 30.31 + 0.853x) and could not be calculated for LDL. Automated HDL values were equal to, or higher than, the total cholesterol concentration in 25 of the 56 samples. The TG concentrations were above the reference interval in 18 samples, and these samples had an average of 96% of the cholesterol measured as HDL by the automated method, and 78% HDL by electrophoresis. Given that it is physiologically impossible to have more cholesterol within the HDL fraction than in the total serum fraction, and the increased proportion of TG found in LDL and very-low-density lipoprotein, our results draw into question the accuracy of the Roche automated assay in quantifying bovine lipoprotein fractions.

Identifiers

PMID36340906
PMCPMC9623755
OpenAlexW4285498293

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.