Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340899›Full record

ArticleJDS communications2022

Frequency of disagreements between producers and veterinarians about pain management in cattle.

Sage Mijares, Lily Edwards-Callaway, Elizabeth Johnstone, Lorann Stallones, Noa Román-Muñiz, Catie Cramer, Johann Coetzee

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDS communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Review of the Effects of Stress on Dairy Cattle Behaviour.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sage MijaresDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, College of Agricultural Sciences, Fort Collins 80523.
Lily Edwards-CallawayDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, College of Agricultural Sciences, Fort Collins 80523.
Elizabeth JohnstoneDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, College of Agricultural Sciences, Fort Collins 80523.
Lorann StallonesDepartment of Psychology, Colorado State University, College of Natural Sciences, Fort Collins 80521.
Noa Román-MuñizDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, College of Agricultural Sciences, Fort Collins 80523.
Catie CramerDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, College of Agricultural Sciences, Fort Collins 80523.
Johann CoetzeeDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Kansas State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Manhattan 66506.
Colorado State University · USKansas State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain management is a key element of ensuring animal welfare. Although the opinions of both producers and veterinarians affect decisions about the use of pain mitigation on cattle operations, little is known about how they communicate about this topic. Given the importance of a veterinary-client-patient relationship for developing pain mitigation protocols, understanding the communication between veterinarians and producers is key to the implementation of robust, industry-wide pain management protocols. The objectives of this survey were to understand how producers and veterinarians may respond to disagreements about pain mitigation and to determine where respondents obtain their knowledge about pain recognition and treatment. Results presented herein are part of a larger study previously described. An online survey was distributed to 6 cattle industry groups. Surveys that were >80% complete were included for analysis (n = 1,066). Approximately half of the respondents identified as producers (497, 46.6%) and half as veterinarians (569, 53.4%). The majority of producers believed that disagreements about the use of pain management in cattle never affected their relationship with their veterinarians (349, 70.2%). The veterinarian respondents indicated more disagreements, although the frequency was relatively low, with 43.9% (250) indicated having a disagreement less than once a year. Most producers and veterinarians indicated they were either "extremely unlikely" or "somewhat unlikely" to dissolve the relationship completely if disagreements about pain management arose (veterinarians: 398/569, 70%; producers: 294/497, 59.1%). Veterinarians and producers reported gaining their knowledge about pain recognition from a variety of sources including personal experience and continuing education opportunities. Disagreements about pain mitigation occurred infrequently; however, this could be due to few discussions about pain management in general. These results indicated that there is opportunity for veterinarians to engage with their producers in more discussions about pain management.

Identifiers

PMID36340899
PMCPMC9623791
OpenAlexW4286638656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.