Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340825›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2022

Need and baseline for harmonising nursing education in respiratory care: preliminary results of a global survey.

Andreja Šajnić, Carol Kelly, Sheree Smith, Karen Heslop-Marshall, Malin Axelsson, José Miguel Padilha, Nicola Roberts, Carmen Hernández, Bridget Murray, Betty Poot and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andreja ŠajnićDept for Respiratory Diseases Jordanovac, University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5194-5221
Carol KellyRespiratory Research Centre, Edge Hill University, Ormskirk, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9927-1382
Sheree SmithSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7469-1022
Karen Heslop-MarshallDept of Respiratory Medicine, Royal Victoria Infirmary Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Malin AxelssonDept of Care Science, Faculty of Health and Society, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
José Miguel PadilhaNursing School of Porto, CINTESIS-Tech4edusim, Porto, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6631-776X
Nicola RobertsSchool of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Carmen HernándezMedical and Nursing Direction, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona University of Barcelona, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.
Bridget MurraySchool of Nursing and Midwifery, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Betty PootSchool of Nursing, Midwifery, and Health Practice, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
Georgia NarsavageSchool of Nursing, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic confirmed that respiratory nurses are critical healthcare providers. Limited knowledge is available about appropriate education to prepare nurses to deliver high-quality respiratory care. A survey was developed by the International Coalition for Respiratory Nursing (ICRN) group to identify the need for a respiratory nursing core curriculum. Method: A 39-item survey was distributed to 33 respiratory nursing experts in 27 countries. Questions asked about current roles, perception of need, expectations for a core curriculum project and respiratory content in nursing education in their countries. Results: 30 responses from 25 countries were analysed; participants predominantly worked in academia (53.3%, 16/30) and clinical practice (40%, 12/30). In total, 97% (29/30) confirmed a need for a core respiratory nursing curriculum. Post-registration nursing programmes at bachelor (83.3%, 25/30) and masters (63.3%, 19/30) levels include internal/medical nursing care; less than half identified separate respiratory nursing content. The core educational programme developed should include knowledge (70%, 21/30), skills (60%, 18/30), and competencies (50%, 15/30), with separate paediatric and adult content. Conclusion: Survey results confirm a wide variation in nursing education and respiratory nursing education across the world, with many countries lacking any formal educational programmes to prepare nurses capable of providing enhanced quality respiratory care. These findings support the need for a core respiratory curriculum. To advance this significant work the ICRN group plans to conduct a Delphi study to identify core curriculum requirements for respiratory nursing education at pre-registration and advanced educational levels to flexibly meet each country's specific educational requirements for recognition of respiratory nursing speciality practice.

Identifiers

PMID36340825
PMCPMC9584575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.