Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340820›Full record

ReviewBreathe (Sheffield, England)2022

Non-CPAP therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea.

Johan Verbraecken, Marijke Dieltjens, Sara Op de Beeck, Anneclaire Vroegop, Marc Braem, Olivier Vanderveken, Winfried Randerath

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Breathe (Sheffield, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07074288 (Obstructive Sleep Apnea Non-PAP Outcomes and Viable Alternatives), which is not on this map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07074288 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Obstructive Sleep Apnea Non-PAP Outcomes and Viable Alternatives (OSANOVA): Comparison of Mandibular Advancement Device and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorWashington University School of MedicineRan2025 to 2027Enrolled60ConditionsObstructive Sleep ApneaArmsMAD, HGNS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Johan VerbraeckenDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem (Antwerp), Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6087-678X
Marijke DieltjensFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5822-1960
Sara Op de BeeckFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5978-9814
Anneclaire VroegopMultidisciplinary Sleep Disorders Centre, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7538-2021
Marc BraemFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8260-4240
Olivier VandervekenMultidisciplinary Sleep Disorders Centre, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4088-4213
Winfried RanderathBethanien Hospital, Clinic of Pneumology and Allergology, Center for Sleep Medicine and Respiratory Care, Institute of Pneumology at the University of Cologne, Solingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5010-8461
University of Antwerp · BEAntwerp University Hospital · BEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea in adults is evolving, from a "one treatment fits all" to a more individualised approach. The spectrum of treatment options is broad and heterogeneous, including conservative, technological and pharmaceutical modalities. This raises the questions of which patients these modalities might be useful for, and if there are specific criteria for single or combined treatment. The most commonly used non-CPAP treatment is a mandibular advancement device. Furthermore, it appears from the available evidence that upper airway surgery, bariatric surgery, and maxillomandibular advancement can be effective in particular patient groups and should be indicated more readily in clinical practice. Technically, a tracheotomy is the most effective surgical treatment, but is not socially acceptable and is associated with major side-effects. Other treatment options are emerging, like positional therapy, hypoglossal nerve stimulation, and myofunctional exercises. Drug therapy is also promising when pathophysiological traits are considered. The range of currently available treatment options will be discussed in this review, with emphasis on the selection of appropriate patients, therapeutic efficacy and compliance, and reference to recent guidelines. In the selection process, routine application of drug-induced sleep endoscopy to assess the site(s) of collapse during sleep can increase the success rate of both surgical interventions and oral appliance therapy. Educational aims: To outline recommendations concerning the proper management of obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) patients that cannot be treated adequately with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) due to intolerance, poor adherence or compliance, or CPAP refusal.To provide information about the selection of appropriate patients for alternative non-CPAP treatment options.To better understand the different aspects of OSA treatment with noninvasive approaches, such as oral appliances, positional therapy, drug treatment and myofunctional therapy, including indications, contraindications, and expected short- and long-term results.To discuss the different surgical options for the treatment of OSA and to provide information on the important issue of proper patient selection for surgery, as most OSA surgical outcomes are associated with the pre-operative assessment of the level(s) of upper airway collapse.

Identifiers

PMID36340820
PMCPMC9584565
OpenAlexW4304184552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.