ArticleEcology and evolution2022
The potential of Jellytoring 2.0 smart tool as a global jellyfish monitoring platform.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The potential of Jellytoring 2.0 smart tool as a global jellyfish monitoring platform.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Corrigendum.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedCorrigendum.2022
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the recent recognition of jellyfish as an important component of marine ecosystems and existing concerns on their potential population increase, they are rarely monitored at the appropriate spatial and temporal scales. Traditional jellyfish monitoring techniques are costly and generally restrict the spatial-temporal resolution limiting the quantity and quality of monitoring data. We introduce Jellytoring 2.0, an automatic recognition tool for jellyfish species based on convolutional neural networks (CNN). We trained Jellytoring 2.0 to identify 15 jellyfish species with a global distribution. Our aim is to offer Jellytoring 2.0 as an open-access tool to serve as the backbone for a system that promotes the creation of large-scale and long-term jellyfish monitoring data. Results reveal that Jellytoring 2.0 performed well in the identification of the 15 species with average precision values ranging between 90% and 99% for most of the species. Four of the species presented slightly lower values (75%-80%). Our system was trained on a relatively small dataset, implying that additional integration of image data will further improve the performance of the CNN. We show how the application of CNNs to image data can deliver a tool that will enable the cost-effective collection of jellyfish data on larger spatial and temporal scales. For Jellytoring 2.0 to become a truly global automatic identification system, we ask scientists and nonscientists to actively contribute with jellyfish image data to extend the number of species it can identify.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.