Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340755›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in neuroscience2022

Neural substrates of spatial processing and navigation in blindness: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis.

Maxime Bleau, Samuel Paré, Daniel-Robert Chebat, Ron Kupers, Joseph Paul Nemargut, Maurice Ptito

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Maxime BleauÉcole d'Optométrie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Samuel ParéÉcole d'Optométrie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Daniel-Robert ChebatVisual and Cognitive Neuroscience Laboratory (VCN Lab), Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Ariel University, Ariel, Israel.
Ron KupersÉcole d'Optométrie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Joseph Paul NemargutÉcole d'Optométrie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Maurice PtitoÉcole d'Optométrie, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Université de Montréal · CAUniversity of Copenhagen · DKAriel University · IL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Even though vision is considered the best suited sensory modality to acquire spatial information, blind individuals can form spatial representations to navigate and orient themselves efficiently in space. Consequently, many studies support the

Indexed as

amodalitymeta-analysisMRIneuroimagingneuroplasticityspatial navigationspatial processingvisual impairments and blindness

Identifiers

PMID36340755
PMCPMC9630591
OpenAlexW4306946247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.