Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340734›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Prediction of endotracheal tube size in pediatric patients: Development and validation of machine learning models.

Miao Zhou, Wen Y Xu, Sheng Xu, Qing L Zang, Qi Li, Li Tan, Yong C Hu, Ning Ma, Jian H Xia, Kun Liu and 8 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07349953 (Estimation of Correlation Betweeen Antropometric Characteristics of Children up to 8 Years and Age-based Formulas for Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube in Elective Intubated Children During General Anesthesia), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07349953 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Estimation of Correlation Betweeen Antropometric Characteristics of Children up to 8 Years and Age-based Formulas for Uncuffed Endotracheal Tube in Elective Intubated Children During General Anesthesia

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMother and Child Health Institute of Serbia Dr Vukan CupicRan2025 to 2025Enrolled103ConditionsEndotracheal Tube, Finger
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Miao ZhouDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wen Y XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Sheng XuNational Key Laboratory of Medical Immunology and Institute of Immunology, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Qing L ZangSchool of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Qi LiSchool of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Li TanSchool of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yong C HuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Ning MaDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, 905th Hospital of PLA, Shanghai, China.
Jian H XiaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pudong New Area People's Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Kun LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Min YeDepartment of Anesthesiology, First Hospital of Nanping City Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Nanping, China.
Fei Y PuSchool of Health Science and Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai, China.
Liang ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Li J SongSchool of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Yang LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Lai JiangDepartment of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Lin GuResearch Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Zui ZouSchool of Anesthesiology, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to construct and validate machine learning models for endotracheal tube (ETT) size prediction in pediatric patients. Methods: Data of 990 pediatric patients underwent endotracheal intubation were retrospectively collected between November 2019 and October 2021, and separated into cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal tube subgroups. Six machine learning algorithms, including support vector regression (SVR), logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), gradient boosting tree (GBR), decision tree (DTR) and extreme gradient boosting tree (XGBR), were selected to construct and validate models using ten-fold cross validation in training set. The optimal models were selected, and the performance were compared with traditional predictive formulas and clinicians. Furthermore, additional data of 71 pediatric patients were collected to perform external validation. Results: The optimal 7 uncuffed and 5 cuffed variables were screened out by feature selecting. The RF models had the best performance with minimizing prediction error for both uncuffed ETT size (MAE = 0.275 mm and RMSE = 0.349 mm) and cuffed ETT size (MAE = 0.243 mm and RMSE = 0.310 mm). The RF models were also superior in predicting power than formulas in both uncuffed and cuffed ETT size prediction. In addition, the RF models performed slightly better than senior clinicians, while they significantly outperformed junior clinicians. Based on SVR models, we proposed 3 novel linear formulas for uncuffed and cuffed ETT size respectively. Conclusion: We have developed machine learning models with excellent performance in predicting optimal ETT size in both cuffed and uncuffed endotracheal intubation in pediatric patients, which provides powerful decision support for clinicians to select proper ETT size. Novel formulas proposed based on machine learning models also have relatively better predictive performance. These models and formulas can serve as important clinical references for clinicians, especially for performers with rare experience or in remote areas.

Indexed as

endotracheal intubationendotracheal tube sizemachine learningpediatric patientsprediction.

Identifiers

PMID36340734
PMCPMC9631215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.