Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340705›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Extravesical vs. intravesical ureteric reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Zhi Wei Law, Caroline C P Ong, Te-Lu Yap, Amos H P Loh, Udayan Joseph, Siam Wee Sim, Lin Yin Ong, Yee Low, Anette S Jacobsen, Yong Chen

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhi Wei LawDepartment of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Caroline C P OngDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Te-Lu YapDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Amos H P LohDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Udayan JosephDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Siam Wee SimDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Lin Yin OngDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Yee LowDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Anette S JacobsenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Yong ChenDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
KK Women's and Children's Hospital · SGSingapore General Hospital · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to compare the outcomes of extravesical (EVUR) and intravesical (IVUR) ureteric reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) Methods: Literature review from Medline, Embase, and Cochrane since inception to March 2022 was performed. Meta-analysis was conducted on eligible randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational cohort studies (OCS) comparing outcomes between EVUR and IVUR. Results: Twelve studies were included, comprising 577 patients (778 ureters) operated by EVUR and 395 patients (635 ureters) by IVUR. Pre-operative VUR grade, postoperative VUR persistence and hydronephrosis was not statistically significant. EVUR had shorter operative time [mean differences (MD) -22.91 min; 95% confidence interval (CI), -44.53 to -1.30, Conclusion: Both EVUR and IVUR are equally effective in correcting primary VUR. Operative time and hospital stay are shorter after EVUR compared to IVUR. However, bilateral EVUR is associated with higher risk of postoperative ARU.

Indexed as

extravesicalintravesicalrecurrencereimplantationvesicoureteral reflux (VUR)

Identifiers

PMID36340705
PMCPMC9633941
OpenAlexW4306963849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.