Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340699›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2022

The social robot companion to support homecare nurses: The guardian study protocol.

Arianna Margaritini, Marco Benadduci, Giulio Amabili, Anna Rita Bonfigli, Riccardo Luzi, Katarzyna Wac, Henk Herman Nap, Elvira Maranesi, Roberta Bevilacqua

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05284292 (GUARDIAN), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05284292 nacompletednot on this map

GUARDIAN: The Social Robot Companion to Support Homecare Nurses

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituto Nazionale di Ricovero e Cura per AnzianiRan2022 to 2022Enrolled30ConditionsAging Problems, CaregiverArmsGUARDIAN platform
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Arianna MargaritiniScientific Direction, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Marco BenadduciScientific Direction, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Giulio AmabiliScientific Direction, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Anna Rita BonfigliScientific Direction, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Riccardo LuziMedical Direction, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Katarzyna WacQuality of Life Technologies Lab, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Henk Herman NapNational Expertise Centre Long-Term Care, Vilans, the Netherlands.
Elvira MaranesiScientific Direction, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.
Roberta BevilacquaScientific Direction, IRCCS INRCA, Ancona, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The reduction of the older people's self-sufficiency and the increase in the need for help in daily activities has a significant impact on the person and their caregivers. The primary objective of the GUARDIAN project is to enable the older people to live as long as possible at home, by means of the GUARDIAN socio-technical platform. Methods: and Analysis: The GUARDIAN platform consists of two connected apps: one dedicated to the caregiver (Caregiver App) and one dedicated to the older people (Senior App), plus a robot (Misty II), to provide coaching in an engaging modality. The study is designed as a technical feasibility pilot to test the GUARDIAN system on a group of older people. Discussions: The proposed solution reflects the real wants and needs of the older people person, increasing the acceptability of the system. In addition, the GUARDIAN project has the potential to have distinguished two phases of testing, so that changes can be made to the platform between the first and second phases, using data, both qualitative and quantitative, collected after the first phase. Ethics and dissemination: The study was approved by the Ethic Committee of the IRCCS INRCA. It was recorded in ClinicalTrials.gov on the number NCT05284292.

Indexed as

AALEmpowerementInformal and formal caregiverOlder peopleSocial assistive robot (SAR)User-centered design

Identifiers

PMID36340699
PMCPMC9634274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.