Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340685›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2022

Non-invasive brain neuromodulation techniques for chronic low back pain.

Tian-Tian Chang, Yu-Hao Chang, Shu-Hao Du, Pei-Jie Chen, Xue-Qiang Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Brain stimulation targets for chronic pain: Insights from meta-analysis, functional connectivity and literature review.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Targeting Prefrontal Cortex Dysfunction in Pain.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tian-Tian ChangDepartment of Sport Rehabilitation, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Yu-Hao ChangDepartment of Luoyang Postgraduate Training, Henan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Luoyang, China.
Shu-Hao DuDepartment of Sport Rehabilitation, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Pei-Jie ChenDepartment of Sport Rehabilitation, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Xue-Qiang WangDepartment of Sport Rehabilitation, Shanghai University of Sport, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai University of Sport · CNHenan University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNShanghai Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural and functional changes of the brain occur in many chronic pain conditions, including chronic low back pain (CLBP), and these brain abnormalities can be reversed by effective treatment. Research on the clinical applications of non-invasive brain neuromodulation (NIBS) techniques for chronic pain is increasing. Unfortunately, little is known about the effectiveness of NIBS on CLBP, which limits its application in clinical pain management. Therefore, we summarized the effectiveness and limitations of NIBS techniques on CLBP management and described the effects and mechanisms of NIBS approaches on CLBP in this review. Overall, NIBS may be effective for the treatment of CLBP. And the analgesic mechanisms of NIBS for CLBP may involve the regulation of pain signal pathway, synaptic plasticity, neuroprotective effect, neuroinflammation modulation, and variations in cerebral blood flow and metabolism. Current NIBS studies for CLBP have limitations, such as small sample size, relative low quality of evidence, and lack of mechanistic studies. Further studies on the effect of NIBS are needed, especially randomized controlled trials with high quality and large sample size.

Indexed as

brain neuromodulationlow back painmechanismspainrTMStDCS

Identifiers

PMID36340685
PMCPMC9627199
OpenAlexW4306843883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.