Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340637›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2022

Work-relatedness of carpal tunnel syndrome: Systematic review including meta-analysis and GRADE.

Awa Hassan, Annechien Beumer, P Paul F M Kuijer, Henk F van der Molen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06686212 (Comparative Effects of Sensory Re-education and Neural Mobilization in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06686212 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effects of Sensory Re-education and Neural Mobilization in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2024 to 2025Enrolled48ConditionsCarpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS)ArmsSensory re-education+ strengthening exercises+ kinesio taping, Neural mobilization+ Strengthening exercises+ Kinesio taping.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Carpal tunnel syndrome.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Awa HassanDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1766-3586
Annechien BeumerDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7817-7821
P Paul F M KuijerDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8277-3730
Henk F van der MolenDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0719-2020
Netherlands Center for Occupational Diseases · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common peripheral nerve entrapment syndrome with a high prevalence among workers. Insights on the physical work-related risk factors is necessary to develop appropriate preventative methods. The objective of this systematic review, including meta-analyses, is to assess which physical work-related risk factors are associated with carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: Systematic literature searches were carried out using PubMed and Embase until September 6, 2021. Studies were included if: (1) CTS was clinically assessed, (2) the studies were prospective cohort studies, and (3) the exposure was reported using terms of exposed/less or nonexposed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE). Results: In total, 9270 patients with CTS from a population of 1,051,707 workers were included from 17 studies. Meta-analyses revealed high-quality evidence for associations between CTS and high exposures to repetition (hazard ratio [HR] 1.87, 95% CI 1.42-2.46), force intensity (HR 1.84, 95%CI 1.22-2.79), exposures above hand activity level of ACGIH (HR 1.75, 95%CI 1.40-2.17), and the Strain Index >10 (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.09-2.30). No significant associations were found for pinch gripping, hand-arm vibration or force duration. High computer-use exposure was significantly associated with a decreased rate of work-related CTS (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.64). Conclusion: This systematic review of prospective cohort studies found high certainty for an increased rate of CTS due to a high Strain Index, exposures exceeding the Activity Level of ACGIH, and high force intensity and high repetition. Workers performing tasks requiring both high force and high repetition even have a higher rate of developing CTS.

Indexed as

carpal tunnel syndromeoccupational exposuresphysical risk factorsprevention

Identifiers

PMID36340637
PMCPMC9629628
OpenAlexW4307935078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.