Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340492›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22022

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided conventional catheter ablation of isthmus-dependent atrial flutter using active catheter imaging.

Stefan Ulbrich, Yan Huo, Jakub Tomala, Michael Wagner, Utz Richter, Liying Pu, Julia Mayer, Angela Zedda, Axel Joachim Krafft, Katherine Lindborg and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Cardiac magnetic resonance-guided cardiac ablation: a case series of an early experience.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stefan UlbrichDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Yan HuoDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Jakub TomalaDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Michael WagnerDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Utz RichterDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Liying PuDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Julia MayerDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Angela ZeddaDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Axel Joachim KrafftSiemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany.
Katherine LindborgImricor Medical Systems, Burnsville, Minnesota.
Christopher PiorkowskiDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Thomas GasparDepartment of Electrophysiology, Heart Center University Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Technische Universität Dresden · DEImricor (United States) · USSiemens Healthineers (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Interventional cardiac magnetic resonance (iCMR) has been established as a radiation-free alternative compared to standard fluoroscopy-guided catheter ablation for cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter to image anatomy, structural alterations, and further catheter guidance. Objective: The purpose of this study was to explore the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of CTI ablations performed completely in the iCMR suite using active catheter imaging. Methods: Consecutive patients underwent iCMR-guided catheter ablation for CTI-dependent atrial flutter. Procedures were performed in a 1.5-T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging unit with MR-conditional ablation catheters. Catheter guidance was achieved using active catheter imaging via integrated MR receive tip coils. Acute success, periprocedural complications, and short-term follow-up were collected for further analysis. Results: All patients (N = 15; 73% male; median age 70 years; interquartile range [67-82]) achieved acute procedural success without any complication. Median procedural time was 43 minutes [33-58] with median radiofrequency delivery time of 18 minutes [12-26]. Postprocedural lesion visualization scanning was completed in a median of 32 minutes [10-42]. None of the patients with 6-month follow-up had atrial flutter recurrence. Conclusion: In the iCMR suite, CTI-dependent atrial flutter ablation could be achieved safely using active catheter imaging without any complication. It further allows detailed anatomic visualization of the CTI, intraprocedural lesion visualization, and exclusion of pericardial effusion.

Indexed as

AblationAtrial flutterCavotricuspid isthmusElectrophysiologyInterventional cardiac magnetic resonance

Identifiers

PMID36340492
PMCPMC9626877
OpenAlexW4283714185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.