Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340476›Full record

ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2022

Project BETTER: Preliminary Feasibility and Acceptability of a Technology-Delivered Educational Program for Pregnant and Postpartum People with Opioid Use Disorder.

Sarah Martin, Anna Beth Parlier-Ahmad, Michelle Eglovitch, Steven J Ondersma, Dace S Svikis, Caitlin E Martin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah MartinSchool of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Anna Beth Parlier-AhmadDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6862-9548
Michelle EglovitchDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Steven J OndersmaDivision of Public Health and Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
Dace S SvikisDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Caitlin E MartinInstitute for Drug and Alcohol Studies, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5560-458X
Virginia Commonwealth University · USMichigan State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Postpartum people with opioid use disorder (OUD) report feeling underprepared for the pregnancy to postpartum transition. We developed a novel, technology-delivered educational intervention for pregnant and parenting people with OUD to address this gap. This study provides a theoretically grounded assessment of the feasibility and acceptability of a new technology-delivered educational intervention (Project BETTER) for pregnant and parenting people receiving medication for OUD (MOUD). Materials and Methods: Pregnant and postpartum people receiving MOUD were recruited from a perinatal addiction clinic research registry to pilot test the technology-delivered intervention. Participants completed one of three modules (Postpartum Transition, Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome, or Child Welfare Interactions) and a survey assessing acceptability based on the theoretical framework of acceptability (TFA). We measured feasibility using process, resource, management, and scientific assessments. Demographics were self-reported. Clinical characteristics were abstracted from the medical record. Results: Feasibility was promising, with 17 of 28 participants approached (61%) agreeing to participate; 70% of these participants ( Conclusion: Our theoretically grounded assessment suggests high feasibility and acceptability for Project BETTER, and provides justification for further evaluation in a clinical trial setting. Technology-delivered educational interventions may help reduce stigma and enhance prenatal education.

Indexed as

acceptabilityfeasibilityopioid use disorderpostpartumpregnancytechnology-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID36340476
PMCPMC9629978
OpenAlexW4307054393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.