ReviewCancer diagnosis & prognosis
Limited Cerebral Metastases in NSCLC: A Literature Review of SRS Versus Whole-brain Radiotherapy.
Review in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: multistate and competing risk models of progression and survival from a single-centre 11-year experience.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Patient-reported Symptoms Differ Between Patients With Brain Metastasis Starting Either Focal Stereotactic Radiotherapy or Whole-brain Radiotherapy.Cancer diagnosis & prognosisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimBrain metastases (BMs) are common in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with or without corticosteroid use has historically been the first choice for most patients with BMs despite its negative impact on cognition and quality of life. However, stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment and has been established for patients with limited, inoperable BMs. SRS and WBRT are either used separately or together, in an attempt to achieve the best possible local and distal control rates and even improve overall survival. A number of phase III trials have focused on answering the question which modality - SRS, WBRT or both - can achieve the best possible results. In this review, we present the existing data regarding the use of SRS compared with WBRT and their combination for NSCLC patients with limited, non-operable BMs. MATERIALS AND
methodsA literature review was performed in PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Library databases from 1995 up to 2021. Principles outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement were followed.
resultsWe identified seven randomised control trials (RCTs) that compared WBRT with WBRT plus SRS boost and four RCTs that compared SRS alone with SRS plus WBRT.
conclusionOverall, addition of WBRT to SRS did not improve survival but had a positive effect on locoregional control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.