ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
A Malignant Tumor Developed Seven Years After Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated With Etoposide-containing Chemotherapy.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimLong-term survival of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is rare, and, to the best of our knowledge, there has been no SCLC patient who developed second malignancy after long-term survival. CASE REPORT: A 66-year-old woman with a history of smoking was admitted to our hospital with a nodule in her right lung. She was diagnosed with cT2aN3M0 localized-SCLC. Chest irradiation and chemotherapy including etoposide was performed. A new nodule appeared in the right lung more than 7 years after the end of treatment for SCLC. A specimen obtained by bronchoscopic biopsy was pathologically confirmed to be a non-SCLC malignancy.
conclusionThere is a possibility of tumor development associated with etoposide, which is known to be carcinogenic, or residual tumor development from combined type SCLC. We could not confirm whether it was second malignancy or recurrence after long-term interval. The number of long-term survivors of SCLC is likely to increase in the future. The clinical course of this patient is interesting from the perspective of long-term survival of SCLC patients and might have implications for the treatment of patients with similar clinical course in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.