Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340348›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Discrimination of genetic and geographical groups of grape varieties (

Iva Šikuten, Petra Štambuk, Ivana Tomaz, Cecile Marchal, Jasminka Karoglan Kontić, Thierry Lacombe, Edi Maletić, Darko Preiner

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. A Comprehensive Review of Phenolic Compounds in Horticultural Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comprehensive Biological and Chemical Evaluation of TwoAntioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Iva ŠikutenDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Petra ŠtambukDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ivana TomazDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Cecile MarchalGrapevine Biological Resources Center, INRAE, Unité Experimental Domaine de Vassal, University of Montpellier, Marseillan, France.
Jasminka Karoglan KontićDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Thierry LacombeAGAP, University of Montpellier CIRAD, Institut Agro, Montpellier, France.
Edi MaletićDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Darko PreinerDepartment of Viticulture and Enology, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
University of Zagreb · HRGenetic Improvement and Adaptation of Mediterranean and Tropical Plants · FRInstitut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grape volatile organic compounds (VOCs) play an important role in the winemaking industry due to their contribution to wine sensory characteristics. Another important role in the winemaking industry have the grapevine varieties used in specific regions or countries for wine production. Due to the high variability of grapevine germplasm, grapevine varieties are as classified based on their genetic and geographical origin into genetic-geographic groups (GEN-GEO). The aim of this research was to investigate VOCs in 50 red grapevine varieties belonging to different GEN-GEO groups. The study included varieties from groups C2 (Italy and France), C7 (Croatia), and C8 (Spain and Portugal). The analysis of VOCs was performed by SPME-Arrow-GC/MS directly from grape skins. The analyzed VOCs included aldehydes, ketones, acids, alcohols, monoterpenes, and sesquiterpenes. The most abundant VOCs were aldehydes and alcohols, while the most numerous were sesquiterpenes. The most abundant compounds, aldehydes and alcohols, were found to be (

Indexed as

discriminationGEN-GEO groupsgrapevine varietiesvolatile organic compoundsvolatile profiles

Identifiers

PMID36340348
PMCPMC9634546
OpenAlexW4306949380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.