Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340312›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and experimental hepatology

Biliary Epithelial Senescence in Cellular Rejection Following Live Donor Liver Transplantation.

Archana Rastogi, Neha Nigam, Ramakrishna Gayatri, Chhagan Bihari, Viniyendra Pamecha

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and experimental hepatology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Integrating senotherapeutics into transplantation: liver reconditioning in an aging donor pool.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Cellular Senescence and Frailty in Transplantation.Current transplantation reports · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Archana RastogiDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Neha NigamDepartment of Pathology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ramakrishna GayatriDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Medicine, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Chhagan BihariDepartment of Pathology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Viniyendra PamechaDepartment of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences · INSanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As with the hepatocytes, cholangiocyte senescence can also easily be detected in damaged small bile ducts and bile ductules during liver disease affecting the biliary system and cholangiocytes. Despite cellular senescence being a feature of chronic progressive cholangiopathies in adults, only a few studies have investigated its role in liver transplant rejection. Method: Transplant biopsies displaying features of rejection were reviewed and classified based on the type of rejection and the time since transplantation. An immunohistochemistry panel has been applied for 3 senescent cell markers (p53, p21, p16). Results: Immunohistochemical expression analysis for the biliary senescence markers (53 biopsies) was done in the post-transplantation periods (Group 1-4) for the cases with the histologically proven diagnosis of rejection. In post-transplant group 1 (<3 months), group 2 (3-6 months), group 3 (6-12 months) and group 4 (>12 months), any 2 senescent markers' positivity was noted in 5/14 (35.7%), 8/13 (61.5%), 16/17 (94.1%) and 9/9 (100%) biopsies respectively and were comparable in all four groups ( Conclusion: This study on a large number of LDLT allograft biopsies demonstrates the role of biliary senescence in rejection and suggests a pathobiological role for senescence in the poor prognosis seen in late acute cellular rejection and chronic rejection.

Indexed as

ACR, Acute cellular rejectionBEC, Biliary epithelial cellsCR/DR, Chronic Rejection/Ductopenic RejectionECR, Early chronic rejectionLAR, Late acute cellular rejectionLDLT, Live donor liver transplantationliverMELD, Model for end-stage liver diseaseRAI, Rejection activity indexrejectionsenescencetransplant

Identifiers

PMID36340312
PMCPMC9630016
OpenAlexW4293386054

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.