Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340270›Full record

ArticleClinical neuropsychiatry2022

An Experience Sampling Measure of the Key Features of Rumination.

Yorgo Hoebeke, M Annelise Blanchard, Alba Contreras, Alexandre Heeren

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical neuropsychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article Highlights.Clinical neuropsychiatry · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yorgo HoebekePsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2565-8311
M Annelise BlanchardPsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9605-7022
Alba ContrerasPsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7292-8770
Alexandre HeerenPsychological Sciences Research Institute, Université catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0553-6149

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Research indicates that rumination can be viewed as a dynamic process that fluctuates over time, within hours and days. An increasing number of intensive longitudinal studies on rumination are accordingly being conducted and published using experiencing sampling methodology (ESM), a technique with measurements in everyday life. Yet, this literature suffers from a profound caveat: rumination has so far been conceptualized and measured as a unitary construct in these ESM studies. This is unfortunate, since such a unitary view contrasts with prominent contemporary models that regard rumination as a multifaceted construct, wherein the key features are not interchangeable and should therefore be measured separately. Moreover, no validated ESM measure of the key features of rumination has yet been developed. Therefore, we developed and validated an ESM protocol and the first ESM questionnaire to assess rumination as a multifaceted construct, measuring five features of rumination. Method: We conducted an ESM study in a community sample of 40 French-speaking participants. They answered the five rumination ESM items in French four times a day for fourteen days. At the end of the ESM assessment period, participants completed trait-like questionnaires of rumination, depression, and general anxiety. Results: The ESM rumination items exhibited good psychometric properties, including excellent within-person variability and convergent validity with corresponding trait-like constructs. Conclusions: Although further validation is warranted, this novel ESM assessment protocol of rumination as a multifaceted construct (validated in French and translated into English) will allow future researchers to study how rumination's features fluctuate and interact with other constructs over time.

Indexed as

daily life assessmentexperience sampling methodologyintensive longitudinal studiespsychometricsruminationstate rumination

Identifiers

PMID36340270
PMCPMC9597648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.