ArticleJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada2021
Needle in a haystack: Looking for tuberculosis in a low-incidence setting.
Article in Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Canada is a low-incidence country for tuberculosis (TB). The BC Public Health Laboratory diagnostic algorithm for pulmonary TB includes acid fast bacilli (AFB) smear and mycobacterial culture of all submitted sputa. TB nucleic acid amplification testing (NAT) is routinely performed on AFB-smear-positive (AFB+) sputa only. We assessed the laboratory-associated costs of implementing the international recommendations for TB NAT on AFB-smear-negative (AFB-) sputa. Methods: Two data sets were obtained: (1) all AFB- samples for a 3-year period (October 1, 2014-September 30, 2017) and (2) all AFB-, TB-culture-positive samples for the same period. One AFB- sample/patient from each defined diagnostic set of sputa was deemed eligible for TB NAT. To stratify patients by ordering location, a 1-year subset of data (October 1, 2016-September 30, 2017) was examined. Results: In the 3-year period, 0.7% of all diagnostic sets were AFB- and culture-positive. In the 1-year period, the provincial TB Services clinics submitted 26% of all AFB- samples received, but these constituted 78% of AFB-, culture-positive samples. Conclusions: The annual cost of TB NAT on one AFB- sputum sample from each eligible diagnostic set would total approximately $247,000. Targeting only TB Services clinic patients would reduce this cost to approximately $64,000/year while capturing more than 75% of AFB-, culture-positive patients. On the basis of our provincial positivity rate, it would cost approximately $6,000 to provide an early TB diagnosis for an AFB-, culture-positive patient. The cost-effectiveness to public health of this approach in a TB low-incidence setting needs to be carefully evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.