Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340210›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada2021

A Canadian perspective on the revised 2020 ASHP-IDSA-PIDS-SIDP guidelines for vancomycin AUC-based therapeutic drug monitoring for serious MRSA infections.

Jackson J Stewart, Sarah Cj Jorgensen, Linda Dresser, Tim Ty Lau, Alfred Gin, Daniel Jg Thirion, Cesilia Nishi, Bruce Dalton

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Disease Canada = Journal officiel de l'Association pour la microbiologie medicale et l'infectiologie Canada, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Development of a model to predict vancomycin serum concentration during continuous infusion of vancomycin in critically ill pediatric patients.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Jackson J StewartPharmacy Department, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Sarah Cj JorgensenPharmacy Department, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Linda DresserLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tim Ty LauPharmaceutical Sciences, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Alfred GinWinnipeg Regional Health Authority Regional Pharmacy Program, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Daniel Jg ThirionPharmacy Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Cesilia NishiPharmaceutical Sciences, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Bruce DaltonPharmacy Department, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Alberta Health Services · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CASinai Health System · CAUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Manitoba · CAVancouver General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: A revised consensus guideline on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of vancomycin for serious methicillin-resistant Methods: Recent literature was critically appraised to determine whether AUC TDM is appropriate for Canadian hospital practice. Results: Previous 2009 vancomycin consensus guidelines recommended trough levels of 15-20 mg/L for serious MRSA infections, based on relatively poor evidence for efficacy or safety. In the past decade, aggressive trough targets have led to unnecessary toxicity. Adoption of a TDM strategy using an alternative parameter (AUC) has been suggested, although the evidence for any outcome benefits is low quality. In addition, implementation would require greater resources at health care institutions in the forms of more frequent serum levels or acquisition of costly Bayesian software programs. Most studies on this subject have been observational and retrospective; therefore, relationships between TDM parameters and outcomes have not been convincingly and consistently demonstrated to be causal in nature. Despite claims to the contrary, based on few Conclusions: There are serious concerns with adoption of AUC TDM of vancomycin into routine practice in Canada. Trough-based monitoring with modest reduction in target levels remains the most evidence-informed practice at this time.

Indexed as

antibiotic stewardshipantibiotic therapybacterial infectionsmethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureusMRSA

Identifiers

PMID36340210
PMCPMC9612435
OpenAlexW3135519480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.