ArticleACS omega2022
Mathematical Approach to Protein Sequence Comparison Based on Physiochemical Properties.
Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use of 2D FFT and DTW in Protein Sequence Comparison.The protein journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The difficult aspect of developing new protein sequence comparison techniques is coming up with a method that can quickly and effectively handle huge data sets of various lengths in a timely manner. In this work, we first obtain two numerical representations of protein sequences separately based on one physical property and one chemical property of amino acids. The lengths of all the sequences under comparison are made equal by appending the required number of zeroes. Then, fast Fourier transform is applied to this numerical time series to obtain the corresponding spectrum. Next, the spectrum values are reduced by the standard inter coefficient difference method. Finally, the corresponding normalized values of the reduced spectrum are selected as the descriptors for protein sequence comparison. Using these descriptors, the distance matrices are obtained using Euclidian distance. They are subsequently used to draw the phylogenetic trees using the UPGMA algorithm. Phylogenetic trees are first constructed for 9 ND4, 9 ND5, and 9 ND6 proteins using the polarity value as the chemical property and the molecular weight as the physical property. They are compared, and it is seen that polarity is a better choice than molecular weight in protein sequence comparison. Next, using the polarity property, phylogenetic trees are obtained for 12 baculovirus and 24 transferrin proteins. The results are compared with those obtained earlier on the identical sequences by other methods. Three assessment criteria are considered for comparison of the results-quality based on rationalized perception, quantitative measures based on symmetric distance, and computational speed. In all the cases, the results are found to be more satisfactory.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.