ArticleACS omega2022
Hydrogen Flow Controller Applied to Driving Behavior Observation of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Performance Test.
Article in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fuel cell performance tests for automotive applications include static and dynamic tests, and the dynamic load test is typically carried out to investigate the cell operating performance related to driving behavior in the particular use of fuel cell electric vehicles. The automatic hydrogen flow controller, utilized to regulate the hydrogen flow as a function of time, is one of the imperative apparatuses applied for the dynamic test. The driving behavior generally consists of rapid load fluctuations, several loads running at idle, full power, overload circumstances, start-stop repeats, and cold starting, and these dynamic variations are directly related to the power required for propelling a vehicle and the demand for hydrogen volume fluctuation throughout time. The desired automatic hydrogen flow controller was designed and manufactured for the dynamic performance test via the driving simulation protocol of a heavy-duty vehicle. The main experimental activities were performed to observe the responsibility and accuracy of the invented controller. The relation between the reliability of using the automatic hydrogen flow controller and the performance improvement of fuel cell operation was studied to gain ideas for further fuel cell modification. The hydrogen flow rates controlled by the created flow controller presented a data tolerance of approximately 0.84% which was not significantly different from the theoretical figure based on T-test analysis. The controller reacted to variations in flow rates in as little as 1-2 s, which was acceptable for the dynamic test. Regarding the performance enhancement, this automatic hydrogen flow controller assisted a single cell to generate 16% more power and 33% more energy at 45 mA as a minimum current demand in comparison with the results obtained from a test system using a traditional hydrogen controller with a constant flow rate.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.