Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36340120›Full record

ReviewACS omega2022

Synthetic Peptides in Doping Control: A Powerful Tool for an Analytical Challenge.

Néstor Alejandro Gómez-Guerrero, Nicolás Mateo González-López, Juan Diego Zapata-Velásquez, Jorge Ariel Martínez-Ramírez, Zuly Jenny Rivera-Monroy, Javier Eduardo García-Castañeda

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS omega, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Néstor Alejandro Gómez-GuerreroChemistry Department, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Carrera 45 No 26-85, Building 451, 11321 Bogotá, Colombia.
Nicolás Mateo González-LópezPharmacy Department, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Carrera 45 No 26-85, Building 450, 11321 Bogotá, Colombia.
Juan Diego Zapata-VelásquezPharmacy Department, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Carrera 45 No 26-85, Building 450, 11321 Bogotá, Colombia.
Jorge Ariel Martínez-RamírezPharmacy Department, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Carrera 45 No 26-85, Building 450, 11321 Bogotá, Colombia.
Zuly Jenny Rivera-MonroyChemistry Department, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Carrera 45 No 26-85, Building 451, 11321 Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6915-8488
Javier Eduardo García-CastañedaPharmacy Department, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Carrera 45 No 26-85, Building 450, 11321 Bogotá, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6882-4397

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptides are very diverse molecules that can participate in a wide variety of biological processes. In this way, peptides are attractive for doping, since these molecules can activate or trigger biological processes that can improve the sports performance of athletes. Peptide molecules are found in the official World Anti-Doping Agency lists, mainly in sections S2, S4, and S5. In most cases, these molecules have a very short half-life in the body and/or are identical to natural molecules in the body, making it difficult to analyze them as performance-enhancing drugs. This article reviews the role of peptides in doping, with special emphasis on the peptides used as reference materials, the pretreatment of samples in biological matrices, the instrumentation, and the validation of analytical methodologies for the analysis of peptides used in doping. The growing need to characterize and quantify these molecules, especially in complex biological matrices, has generated the need to search for robust strategies that allow for obtaining sensitive and conclusive results. In this sense, strategies such as solid phase peptide synthesis (SPPS), seeking to obtain specific peptides, metabolites, or isotopically labeled analogs, is a key tool for adequate quantification of different peptide molecules in biological matrices. This, together with the use of optimal methodologies for sample pretreatment (e.g., SPE or protein precipitation), and for subsequent analysis by high-resolution techniques (mainly hyphenated LC-HRMS techniques), have become the preferred instrumentation to meet the analytical challenge involved in the analysis of peptides in complex matrices.

Identifiers

PMID36340120
PMCPMC9631397

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.