Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36339969›Full record

ReviewEarly childhood education journal2022

An Environmental Scan of Existing Canadian Childcare Resources Targeting Improvements in Health Behaviours.

Valerie Carson, Madison Predy, Stephen Hunter, Kate Storey, Anna P Farmer, Jessie-Lee McIsaac, Jenn Flynn

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Early childhood education journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. International school-related sedentary behaviour recommendations for children and youth.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Valerie CarsonFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3009-3282
Madison PredyFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0571-390X
Stephen HunterFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8416-8182
Kate StoreySchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8215-9143
Anna P FarmerFaculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8238-2537
Jessie-Lee McIsaacDepartment of Child and Youth Study, Faculty of Education, Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, NS Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-9294-5313
Jenn FlynnAPPLE Schools, Edmonton, AB Canada.
University of Alberta · CAApple (Israel) · ILMount Saint Vincent University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective was to conduct an environmental scan of existing Canadian childcare resources targeting nutrition, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and/or sleep. A comprehensive search plan was conducted that involved four search strategies: (1) grey literature databases, (2) customized Google search engines, (3) targeted websites, and (4) consultation with content experts. A resource (i.e., information, materials) must have been created by government or an organization/agency within Canada, available in English, intended for childcare educators or directors working with children ≤ 5 years of age, and focused on targeting improvements in nutrition, physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and/or sleep. The quality of each included resource was assessed using a modified version of the Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance checklist. A total of 192 eligible resources were included. Most resources targeted only nutrition (n = 101) or physical activity (n = 60), and few resources targeted only sedentary behaviour (n = 2) or sleep (n = 1). The remaining 28 resources targeted more than one health behaviour. The 4 most common topics of resources were menu/meal planning (n = 55), healthy nutrition practices/environment (n = 37), physical activities/games (n = 33), and nutrition/food literacy (n = 20). Only 52 included resources cited evidence. One-third of the included resources (n = 64) were rated as high quality, including 55 that received a point for the significance criterion. Therefore, numerous high quality Canadian childcare resources exist for nutrition and physical activity. Future resource development is needed for sedentary behaviour and sleep. Findings can assist future intervention work and the database of resources can be utilized by relevant stakeholders to support other childcare initiatives. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10643-021-01266-2.

Indexed as

Child careEnvironmental scanNutritionPhysical activitySedentary behaviourSleep

Identifiers

PMID36339969
PMCPMC9622543
OpenAlexW3204959299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.