ArticleOphthalmology science2023
Investigating Determinants and Evaluating Deep Learning Training Approaches for Visual Acuity in Foveal Hypoplasia.
Article in Ophthalmology science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perspectives on the Current and Future State of Artificial Intelligence in Medical Genetics.American journal of medical genetics. Part A · 2025Review
- Deep Learning Study of Alkaptonuria Spinal Disease Assesses Global and Regional Severity and Detects Occult Treatment Status.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Article
- Foveal Hypoplasia Grading with Optical Coherence Tomography: Agreement and Challenges Across Experience Levels.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in clinical genetics.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Review
- Quantitative Foveal Structural Metrics as Predictors of Visual Acuity in Human Albinism.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2024Article
- Recognition of Genetic Conditions After Learning With Images Created Using Generative Artificial Intelligence.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Generative Methods for Pediatric Genetics Education.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- SynthEye: Investigating the Impact of Synthetic Data on Artificial Intelligence-assisted Gene Diagnosis of Inherited Retinal Disease.Ophthalmology science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the relationships between foveal structure and visual function in a cohort of individuals with foveal hypoplasia (FH) and to estimate FH grade and visual acuity using a deep learning classifier. Design: Retrospective cohort study and experimental study. Participants: A total of 201 patients with FH were evaluated at the National Eye Institute from 2004 to 2018. Methods: Structural components of foveal OCT scans and corresponding clinical data were analyzed to assess their contributions to visual acuity. To automate FH scoring and visual acuity correlations, we evaluated the following 3 inputs for training a neural network predictor: (1) OCT scans, (2) OCT scans and metadata, and (3) real OCT scans and fake OCT scans created from a generative adversarial network. Main Outcome Measures: The relationships between visual acuity outcomes and determinants, such as foveal morphology, nystagmus, and refractive error. Results: The mean subject age was 24.4 years (range, 1-73 years; standard deviation = 18.25 years) at the time of OCT imaging. The mean best-corrected visual acuity (n = 398 eyes) was equivalent to a logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR) value of 0.75 (Snellen 20/115). Spherical equivalent refractive error (SER) ranged from -20.25 diopters (D) to +13.63 D with a median of +0.50 D. The presence of nystagmus and a high-LogMAR value showed a statistically significant relationship ( Conclusions: Nystagmus and foveal anatomy impact visual outcomes in patients with FH, and computational algorithms reliably estimate FH grading and visual acuity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.