ArticleAME case reports2022
Malignant anaplastic meningioma in neurofibromatosis type 1 patient: a rare case report.
Article in AME case reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Challenging diagnosis and management of anaplastic meningioma in a pediatric patient: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Are neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) patients at increased risk of meningioma and in particular malignant meningioma?AME case reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Meningiomas are usually associated with neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF-2), while gliomas are usually associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1). NF-1 is an autosomal dominant genetic disorder associated with skin manifestations, bone conditions, and different types of benign and malignant tumors. Grade 3 anaplastic meningiomas are rare tumors with a poor prognosis. Systemic treatments in grade 3 meningiomas are experimental, with some reports suggestive of minimal clinical benefits. They are used occasionally for recurrent cases with no surgical or radiotherapy roles. In our case, we will focus the discussion on grade 3 anaplastic meningioma in a patient with NF-1, using chemotherapy for this aggressive, recurrent tumor. To our knowledge, this is the first case of NF-1 associated with malignant anaplastic meningioma in English literature. Case Description: In this case report, we present a 25-year-old left-handed female patient who fits the diagnostic criteria for NF-1. She presented with focal seizure and was diagnosed with grade 3 anaplastic meningioma, a highly aggressive tumor. She experienced a rapid recurrence after her initial surgery and eventually received multiple lines of treatments, including radiation and chemotherapy [temozolomide (TMZ)]. Conclusions: Systemic therapy in grade 3 meningiomas is still experimental and may have a slight clinical benefit. As a result, further prospective, multicentric studies are needed to ascertain these outcomes. Patients should be included in prospective trials because of the poor prognosis and aggressive nature of grade 3 meningiomas. In addition, discovering specific molecular biomarkers will allow us to suggest an individualized treatment. This case suggests that the differential diagnosis of a mass in a patient with NF-1 should include tumors known to be associated with the syndrome as well as sporadic, unrelated neoplasms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.