Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36339881›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Food addiction in Bulimia Nervosa: Analysis of body composition, psychological and problematic foods profile.

Lucero Munguía, Lucía Camacho-Barcia, Anahí Gaspar-Pérez, Roser Granero, Carla Galiana, Susana Jiménez-Murcia, Carlos Dieguez, Ashley Nicole Gearhardt, Fernando Fernández-Aranda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucero MunguíaDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Lucía Camacho-BarciaDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Anahí Gaspar-PérezDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Roser GraneroPsychoneurobiology of Eating and Addictive Behaviors Group, Neurosciences Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.
Carla GalianaPsychoneurobiology of Eating and Addictive Behaviors Group, Neurosciences Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.
Susana Jiménez-MurciaDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos DieguezCIBER Fisiopatología Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain.
Ashley Nicole GearhardtDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States.
Fernando Fernández-ArandaDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Bellvitge, Barcelona, Spain.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESInstitut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Food Addiction (FA) has been related with eating disorders (ED), especially Bulimia Nervosa (BN). BN + FA may have different physical characteristics than patients with BN without the comorbidity, such as body mass index (BMI) or body composition, and psychological as emotion regulation. However, the relationship between psychological and physical aspects, connected by problematic food and its influence on body composition, has been barely studied. Therefore, the aims of the present study are. Aims: (a) To explore the differences in body composition between FA positive (FA+) and negative (FA-) in women with BN; (b) to identify problematic relationship with certain food types, according with the foods mentioned in the YFAS scale questionnaire, between FA+ and FA- patients; (c) to know the psychological characteristic differences between FA+ and FA- patients, considering emotion regulation, personality traits and general psychopathological state; (d) to identify the relationship between physical and psychological traits, and the identified problematic foods, in patients with BN and FA. Methodology: Results: The 88% of patients with BN presented FA+. Patients with BN who were FA+ self-reported more problematic relationships with sweets and starches. Also presented higher emotion regulation difficulties, general psychopathology and eating symptomatology severity, than those without FA. Finally, emotional regulation difficulties were positively associated with higher eating disorder symptomatology and more types of foods self-reported as problematic, which increased indirectly fat mass. Conclusion: The results suggest that BN + FA presented more eating and psychopathology symptomatology and higher problems with specific food types. As well, the path analysis emphasized that emotion regulation difficulties might be related with problematic food relationship in BN, impacting over the ED severity. Implications: The results may impact the development of precise therapies for patients with BN + FA.

Indexed as

body compositionBulimia Nervosaemotion regulationfood addictionproblematic foods

Identifiers

PMID36339881
PMCPMC9632855
OpenAlexW4306923372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.