Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36339857›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022

Selective D3 receptor antagonism modulates neural response during negative emotional processing in substance dependence.

Ioanna A Vamvakopoulou, Leon Fonville, Alexandra Hayes, John McGonigle, Rebecca Elliott, Karen D Ersche, Remy Flechais, Csaba Orban, Anna Murphy, Dana G Smith and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Dopamine D3 Receptor Modulates Akt/mTOR and ERKInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ioanna A VamvakopoulouDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Leon FonvilleDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Alexandra HayesDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
John McGonigleDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rebecca ElliottNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Karen D ErscheBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Remy FlechaisDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Csaba OrbanDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anna MurphyNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Dana G SmithBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
John SucklingBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Eleanor M TaylorNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Bill DeakinNeuroscience and Psychiatry Unit, Institute of Brain, Behaviour and Mental Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Trevor W RobbinsBehavioural and Clinical Neuroscience Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
David J NuttDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anne R Lingford-HughesDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Louise M PatersonDivision of Psychiatry, Department of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Imperial College London · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G1000018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Negative affective states contribute to the chronic-relapsing nature of addiction. Mesolimbic dopamine D3 receptors are well placed to modulate emotion and are dysregulated in substance dependence. Selective antagonists might restore dopaminergic hypofunction, thus representing a potential treatment target. We investigated the effects of selective D3 antagonist, GSK598809, on the neural response to negative emotional processing in substance dependent individuals and healthy controls. Methodology: Functional MRI BOLD response was assessed during an evocative image task, 2 h following acute administration of GSK598809 (60 mg) or placebo in a multi-site, double-blind, pseudo-randomised, cross-over design. Abstinent drug dependent individuals (DD, Results: No group differences in task-related BOLD signal were identified between DD and controls. However, subgroup analysis revealed greater amygdala/insular BOLD signal in PD compared with AO groups. Following drug administration, GSK598809 increased BOLD response across HC and DD groups in thalamus, caudate, putamen, and pallidum, and reduced BOLD response in insular and opercular cortices relative to placebo. Multivariate analyses in Conclusion: Acute GSK598809 modulates the BOLD response to aversive image processing, providing evidence that D3 antagonism may impact emotional regulation. Enhanced BOLD response within D3-rich mesolimbic regions is consistent with its pharmacology and with attenuation of substance-related hypodopaminergic function. However, the lack of group differences in task-related BOLD response and the non-specific effect of GSK598809 between groups makes it difficult to ascertain whether D3 antagonism is likely to be normalising or restorative in our abstinent populations. The suggestion of differential D3 modulation between AO and PD subgroups is intriguing, raising the possibility of divergent treatment responses. Further study is needed to determine whether D3 antagonism should be recommended as a treatment target in substance dependence.

Indexed as

addictionalcoholD3 receptordopamineemotional processingfMRIpolydrugpolysubstance

Identifiers

PMID36339857
PMCPMC9627287
OpenAlexW4306842256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.