ArticleJournal of the American Statistical Association2021
Integrating multidimensional data for clustering analysis with applications to cancer patient data.
Article in Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Uncovering the Understanding of the Concept of Patient Similarity in Cancer Research and Treatment: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- A clustering approach to integrative analyses of multiomic cancer data.Journal of applied statistics · 2025Article
- Nextcast: A software suite to analyse and model toxicogenomics data.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022Article
- Unifying Diagnosis Identification and Prediction Method Embedding the Disease Ontology Structure From Electronic Medical Records.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Advances in high-throughput genomic technologies coupled with large-scale studies including The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project have generated rich resources of diverse types of omics data to better understand cancer etiology and treatment responses. Clustering patients into subtypes with similar disease etiologies and/or treatment responses using multiple omics data types has the potential to improve the precision of clustering than using a single data type. However, in practice, patient clustering is still mostly based on a single type of omics data or ad hoc integration of clustering results from individual data types, leading to potential loss of information. By treating each omics data type as a different informative representation from patients, we propose a novel multi-view spectral clustering framework to integrate different omics data types measured from the same subject. We learn the weight of each data type as well as a similarity measure between patients via a non-convex optimization framework. We solve the proposed non-convex problem iteratively using the ADMM algorithm and show the convergence of the algorithm. The accuracy and robustness of the proposed clustering method is studied both in theory and through various synthetic data. When our method is applied to the TCGA data, the patient clusters inferred by our method show more significant differences in survival times between clusters than those inferred from existing clustering methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.