Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36339752›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2022

Clinical utility of ultrasonography, pulse oximetry and arterial line derived hemodynamic parameters for predicting post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing elective craniotomy for excision of brain tumors - A prospective observational study.

Sakshi Kumari Bhimsaria, Prasanna Udupi Bidkar, Ankita Dey, Srinivasan Swaminathan, Jerry Jame Joy, Haricandrakumar T, Mukilan Balasubramanian, P M Siva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sakshi Kumari BhimsariaNidan Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Prasanna Udupi BidkarNeuroanaesthesia Division, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.
Ankita DeyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Bathinda, Punjab, India.
Srinivasan SwaminathanDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.
Jerry Jame JoyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.
Haricandrakumar TDepartment of Biostatistics, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.
Mukilan BalasubramanianDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India.
P M SivaDepartment of Community Medicine, Coimbatore Medical College, Tamilnadu, India.
Jawaharlal Institute of Post Graduate Medical Education and Research · INAll India Institute of Medical Sciences · INCoimbatore Medical College and Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Hypotension, which is a common adverse effect of induction of anesthesia, may be especially detrimental in neurosurgical patients. Hence, it is important to investigate hemodynamic parameters which may be useful in identifying patients at risk of hypotension, following induction. Our study was designed to assess the utility of parameters derived from ultrasonography, pulse oximeter and arterial line for predicting post-induction hypotension. Methods: The study was designed as a prospective, observational trial. Written informed consent was obtained from 100 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) 1 and 2 patients, between 18-60 years of age, scheduled for elective craniotomy for brain tumors. Arterial cannula was inserted before induction of anesthesia and connected to Vigileo cardiac output monitor. Baseline stroke volume variation (SVV), stroke volume (SV), cardiac index (Ci), cardiac output (CO) and pulse pressure variation (PPV) were recorded. Plethysmography variability index (PVI) and perfusion index (PI) were obtained from the Masimo rainbow SET® Radical-7® pulse oximeter. Ultrasonographic assessment of the inferior vena cava (IVC) was performed before induction of anesthesia and again within 15 min after induction. Maximum and minimum IVC diameters (dIVCmax and dIVCmin) and collapsibility index (CI) were measured. All the other aforementioned parameters were recorded every minute starting at induction, until the 15 Results: PI, CI and dIVCmax were found to have the largest AUC Conclusion: Non-invasively derived hemodynamic parameters like dIVCmax, CI and PI were more accurate for the prediction of post-induction hypotension, compared to invasively derived parameters.

Indexed as

Collapsibility indexHypotensionPerfusion indexPlethysmographic variability indexUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID36339752
PMCPMC9634272
OpenAlexW4307149281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.