SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2022
Tear function in patients with diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Interaction of Diabetes Duration and Tear Film Osmolarity in the Estimation of Tear Film Instability: A Cross-Sectional Study of 60 Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Comparison of tear function in patients with and without mental disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Biomedical journal · 2026Article
- Association of the glucose metabolism continuum (fasting plasma glucose/HbA1c) with tear-film stability and secretion: ocular surface evidence across non-diabetes, prediabetes, and diabetes.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Diabetic dry eye: advances in pathogenesis, diagnostic strategies, and therapeutic approaches.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Nomogram-based risk stratification for postoperative dry eye in diabetic cataract patients and its application in tiered nursing care.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Tear Film Alterations in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Beyond the Surface: Revealing the Concealed Effects of Hyperglycemia on Ocular Surface Homeostasis and Dry Eye Disease.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2025Review
- Article
- GLP-1R Agonists Improve Ocular Surface Parameters in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Clinical ocular surface characteristics and expression of MUC5AC in diabetics: a population-based study.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Dry Eye in Diabetes: The Indian Diabetic and Endocrine Eye Diseases (INDEED) Review.TouchREVIEWS in endocrinology · 2024Review
- Intraocular lens selection in diabetic patients: How to increase the odds for success.World journal of diabetes · 2024Review
- Immune-Mediated Ocular Surface Disease in Diabetes Mellitus-Clinical Perspectives and Treatment: A Narrative Review.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Research progress on ocular complications caused by type 2 diabetes mellitus and the function of tears and blepharons.Open life sciences · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To examine tear function in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Method: We searched Embase and PubMed from database inception to March 16, 2022. We included observational studies that compared tear function between patients with and without DM. Tear function was measured using invasive tear breakup time (ITBUT) and Schirmer's 1 test. Pooled results are presented as standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) based on random-effects models. Results: We included 59 studies (7,234 eyes) comparing the tear function between patients with and without DM. This meta-analysis indicated that patients with DM had worse tear function than those without DM (ITBUT: SMD: -0.98, 95% CI: -1.27 to -0.69; Schirmer's 1 test: SMD: -0.45, 95% CI: -0.64 to -0.26), and the results remained consistent in patients with different types of DM (e.g., type 1 DM and type 2 DM) and from different ethnic backgrounds (e.g., Asian vs. non-Asian). Patients with DM under poor glycemic control had worse tear function than those of the non-DM group (ITBUT: SMD: -1.26, 95% CI: -1.86 to -0.66; Schirmer's 1 test: SMD: -0.25, 95% CI: -0.48 to -0.02), whereas there were no significant differences in tear function between patients with DM under optimal glycemic control and non-DM groups. Conclusions: We found that patients with type 1 or type 2 DM had significantly reduced tear function. The level of tear function could be determined by glycemic control, and therefore, our findings suggest that glycemic control in patients with DM is critical for maintaining tear function. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42021250498.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.