ArticleJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Biological reactions of dental pulp stem cells cultured in presence of new xenograft bone substitutes from different sources: An
Article in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of autogenous tooth bone graft's impact on cellular behaviour and mineralized tissue formation: an in vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Novel use of bisphosphonates to improve surgical outcomes in experimental bone tuberculosis.World journal of orthopedics · 2026Article
- Evaluation of periodontal ligament stem cell viability and proliferation on native collagen membranes: AnJournal of Indian Society of PeriodontologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: This study aimed to compare the biological reactions of dental pulp stem cells (DPSCs) cultured on new xenograft bone substitutes derived from camel and bovine bones. Materials and Methods: DPSCs were cultured and placed on different xenograft materials including Bone Plus (bovine), Camel Bone, and demineralized bovine bone matrix. The viability and proliferation of cells were evaluated by the methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium assay after 24, 48, and 72 h. The alkaline phosphatase (ALP) test and Alizarin red staining were performed at 7 and 21 days to assess the osteoblastic differentiation of cells. Osteocalcin (OCN) gene expression was evaluated qualitatively at 3-, 7- and 14-days using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Semi-quantitative PCR was also performed using ImageJ software. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and Tukey's honestly significant difference test. Results: The cell proliferation rate was significantly different among the three xenograft bone substitutes at 24-, 48- and 72 h ( Conclusions: The Camel Bone xenograft caused a high proliferation rate and optimal osteogenic differentiation of DPSCs qualitatively and semi-quantitatively
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.