Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36339249›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction open2022

Human endometrial cell-type-specific RNA sequencing provides new insights into the embryo-endometrium interplay.

Mariann Koel, Kaarel Krjutškov, Merli Saare, Külli Samuel, Dmitri Lubenets, Shintaro Katayama, Elisabet Einarsdottir, Eva Vargas, Alberto Sola-Leyva, Parameswaran Grace Lalitkumar and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Mariann KoelCompetence Centre on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8567-7296
Kaarel KrjutškovCompetence Centre on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.
Merli SaareCompetence Centre on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0221-2093
Külli SamuelCompetence Centre on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.
Dmitri LubenetsDepartment of Cell Biology, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Shintaro KatayamaStem Cells and Metabolism Research Program, Research Programs Unit, University of Helsinki, and Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland.
Elisabet EinarsdottirStem Cells and Metabolism Research Program, Research Programs Unit, University of Helsinki, and Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland.
Eva VargasDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5418-8518
Alberto Sola-LeyvaDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1388-1532
Parameswaran Grace LalitkumarDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska Univeristy Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6733-533X
Kristina Gemzell-DanielssonDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet, and Karolinska Univeristy Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6516-1444
David BlesaDepartment of Product Development, IGENOMIX, Valencia, Spain.
Carlos SimonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Valencia University and INCLIVA in Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Fredrik LannerDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Juha KereStem Cells and Metabolism Research Program, Research Programs Unit, University of Helsinki, and Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, Finland.
Andres SalumetsCompetence Centre on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.
Signe AltmäeCompetence Centre on Health Technologies, Tartu, Estonia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0708-1865
Competence Centre on Health Technologies (Estonia) · EEUniversidad de Granada · ESUniversity of Helsinki · FIKarolinska University Hospital · SEBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · USBoston University · USIgenomix · ESKarolinska Institutet · SEUniversity of Tartu · EE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionWhich genes regulate receptivity in the epithelial and stromal cellular compartments of the human endometrium, and which molecules are interacting in the implantation process between the blastocyst and the endometrial cells? SUMMARY ANSWER: A set of receptivity-specific genes in the endometrial epithelial and stromal cells was identified, and the role of galectins (LGALS1 and LGALS3), integrin β1 (ITGB1), basigin (BSG) and osteopontin (SPP1) in embryo-endometrium dialogue among many other protein-protein interactions were highlighted. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The molecular dialogue taking place between the human embryo and the endometrium is poorly understood due to ethical and technical reasons, leaving human embryo implantation mostly uncharted. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: Paired pre-receptive and receptive phase endometrial tissue samples from 16 healthy women were used for RNA sequencing. Trophectoderm RNA sequences were from blastocysts. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING

methodsCell-type-specific RNA-seq analysis of freshly isolated endometrial epithelial and stromal cells using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) from 16 paired pre-receptive and receptive tissue samples was performed. Endometrial transcriptome data were further combined MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: In total, 499 epithelial and 581 stromal genes were up-regulated in the receptive phase endometria when compared to pre-receptive samples. The constructed protein-protein interactions identified a complex network of 558 prioritized protein-protein interactions between trophectodermal, epithelial and stromal cells, which were grouped into clusters based on the function of the involved molecules. The role of galectins (LGALS1 and LGALS3), integrin β1 (ITGB1), basigin (BSG LARGE SCALE DATA: RNA-seq data are available at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo under accession number GSE97929. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Providing a static snap-shot of a dynamic process and the nature of prediction analysis is limited to the known interactions available in databases. Furthermore, the cell sorting technique used separated enriched epithelial cells and stromal cells but did not separate luminal from glandular epithelium. Also, the use of biopsies taken from non-pregnant women and using spare IVF embryos (due to ethical considerations) might miss some of the critical interactions characteristic of natural conception only. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsThe findings of our study provide new insights into the molecular embryo-endometrium interplay in the first steps of implantation process in humans. Knowledge about the endometrial cell-type-specific molecules that coordinate successful implantation is vital for understanding human reproduction and the underlying causes of implantation failure and infertility. Our study results provide a useful resource for future reproductive research, allowing the exploration of unknown mechanisms of implantation. We envision that those studies will help to improve the understanding of the complex embryo implantation process, and hopefully generate new prognostic and diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic approaches to target both infertility and fertility, in the form of new contraceptives. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: This research was funded by the Estonian Research Council (grant PRG1076); Horizon 2020 innovation grant (ERIN, grant no. EU952516); Enterprise Estonia (grant EU48695); the EU-FP7 Marie Curie Industry-Academia Partnerships and Pathways (IAPP, grant SARM, EU324509); Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (MINECO) and European Regional Development Fund (FEDER) (grants RYC-2016-21199, ENDORE SAF2017-87526-R, and Endo-Map PID2021-127280OB-100); Programa Operativo FEDER Andalucía (B-CTS-500-UGR18; A-CTS-614-UGR20), Junta de Andalucía (PAIDI P20_00158); Margarita Salas program for the Requalification of the Spanish University system (UJAR01MS); the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (KAW 2015.0096); Swedish Research Council (2012-2844); and Sigrid Jusélius Foundation; Academy of Finland. A.S.-L. is funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (PRE2018-085440). K.G.-D. has received consulting fees and/or honoraria from RemovAid AS, Norway Bayer, MSD, Gedeon Richter, Mithra, Exeltis, MedinCell, Natural cycles, Exelgyn, Vifor, Organon, Campus Pharma and HRA-Pharma and NIH support to the institution; D.B. is an employee of IGENOMIX. The rest of the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Indexed as

blastocystembryo implantationendometrial epitheliumendometrial receptivityendometrial stromainteractome

Identifiers

PMID36339249
PMCPMC9632455
OpenAlexW4306154924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.