ArticleHuman reproduction open2022
Reproductive outcomes following recurrent first-trimester miscarriage: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Human reproduction open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Why low-dose aspirin persists in recurrent pregnancy loss without APS: cognitive bias and system design.AJOG global reports · 2026Article
- Identification of potential NAD-related biomarkers of recurrent miscarriage risk.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- An early prediction model for high-quality blastocyst development based on ANA titer and baseline demographic characteristics in the first IVF/ICSI cycle.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- After the Shock: Impact of Ectopic Pregnancy on Subsequent Fertility and Parenthood.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Fertility, time to pregnancy, and pregnancy outcomes among women with recurrent miscarriages in the UK: a prospective observational longitudinal study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- Views of knowledge users on recurrent miscarriage services and supports in the Republic of Ireland: a qualitative interview study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Reproductive outcomes in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss after embryonic chromosomal microarray analysis.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Proteomics profiling reveals lipid metabolism abnormalities during oogenesis in unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Factors that shape recurrent miscarriage care experiences: findings from a national survey.BMC health services research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
study questionWhat are the subsequent reproductive outcomes (livebirths, miscarriages or other adverse pregnancy outcomes or no further pregnancy) of women with recurrent miscarriage (RM) attending a dedicated clinic? SUMMARY ANSWER: Of women with RM, 77% had a subsequent pregnancy, and among these pregnancies, the livebirth rate was 63%. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: RM affects ∼1-3% of women of reproductive age. RM has known associations with advanced maternal age, obesity, diabetes, inherited thrombophilias, thyroid dysfunction, endometriosis and parental balanced translocations. However, ∼ 50% of women or couples will be left without an explanation for their pregnancy loss, even after completing investigations. RM is also associated with secondary infertility and adverse pregnancy outcomes including preterm birth and perinatal death. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION: We undertook a retrospective cohort study to identify subsequent pregnancy outcomes in women with RM, defined as three consecutive first-trimester miscarriages. Women attending the RM clinic at a tertiary university hospital in the Republic of Ireland over 12 years (2008-2020) with a confirmed diagnosis of primary or secondary first-trimester RM were eligible for inclusion. In total, 923 charts were identified for review against the eligibility criteria. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING
methodsWomen with non-consecutive first-trimester miscarriages or ectopic pregnancy were excluded. Epidemiological and clinical information regarding medical history, investigation and management was gathered from paper and electronic medical records. Data were analysed using SPSS (Version 27). Associations between maternal characteristics and outcomes were explored using the χ MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There were 748 women who were included; 332 (44%) had primary RM and 416 (56%) had secondary RM. The median age was 36 years (range 19-47). Foetal aneuploidy was the most common investigative finding (15%; n = 111/748); 60% had unexplained RM. In addition to supportive care, most women were prescribed aspirin (96%) and folic acid (75%). Of the 748 women, 573 had a subsequent pregnancy (77%) and 359 (48% of all women; 63% of pregnancies) had a livebirth, while 208 had a further pregnancy loss (28% of all women; 36% of pregnancies) and 6 were still pregnant at the end of the study. Women aged 35-39 years were more likely to have a livebirth than no further pregnancy (relative risk ratio (RRR): 2.29 (95% CI: 1.51-5.30)). Women aged 30-34 years were more likely to have a livebirth (RRR: 3.74 (95% CI: 1.80-7.79)) or a miscarriage (RRR: 2.32 (95% CI: 1.07-4.96)) than no further pregnancy. Smokers were less likely to have a livebirth (RRR: 0.37 (95% CI: 0.20-0.69)) or a miscarriage (RRR: 0.45 (95% CI: 0.22-0.90)) than no further pregnancy. Couples with an abnormal parental karyotype were less likely to have a miscarriage than no further pregnancy (RRR: 0.09 (95% CI: 0.01-0.79)). Including successive pregnancies conceived over the study period, the overall livebirth rate was 63% (n = 466/742), but this was reduced to 44% in women aged ≥40 years and 54% in women with infertility. LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: This work covers 13 years; however, those included in the later years have a shorter follow-up time. Although electronic health records have improved data availability, data collection in this cohort remains hampered by the absence of a formal booking visit for women presenting with miscarriage and a national miscarriage database or register. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
findingsOur findings are largely reassuring as most women with RM and hoping to conceive achieved a livebirth. In addition to older age, smoking and parental balanced translocations were associated with a reduced likelihood of further pregnancy. No investigation or treatment was associated with pregnancy outcome, reiterating the importance of the supportive aspects of care for women and their partners after RM and counselling regarding individual risk factors. This contributes to the limited international data on the investigative findings and treatment of women with RM. The high rate of prescribed medications merits greater scrutiny, in conjunction with other pregnancy outcomes, and reiterates the need for a national guideline on RM. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: L.A.L. is a PhD scholar funded through the Pregnancy Loss Research Group, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Cork. M.H. and C.F. are Postdoctoral Researchers on a project funded by the Health Research Board Ireland [ILP-HSR-2019-011] and led by K.O.D., titled: 'Study of the impact of dedicated recurrent miscarriage clinics in the Republic of Ireland'. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript. The authors have no conflicts of interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.