Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36339236›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2022

Workplace violence against Chinese health professionals 2013-2021: A study of national criminal judgment documents.

Yu Xiao, Ting-Ting Chen, Shao-Yi Zhu, Ling Zong, Na Du, Chun-Ya Li, Hao-Fei Cheng, Qi Zhou, Li-Shi Luo, Juan Jia

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yu XiaoPsychosomatic Medical Center, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
Ting-Ting ChenNursing School, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu, China.
Shao-Yi ZhuDepartment of Psychiatry, Shantou University Mental Health Center, Shantou, China.
Ling ZongDepartment of Judicial Expertise, Zhongshan Third People's Hospital, Zhongshan, China.
Na DuPsychosomatic Medical Center, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
Chun-Ya LiPsychosomatic Medical Center, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
Hao-Fei ChengPsychosomatic Medical Center, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
Qi ZhouInstitute (College) of Integrative Medicine, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.
Li-Shi LuoPsychosomatic Medical Center, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
Juan JiaPsychosomatic Medical Center, The Fourth People's Hospital of Chengdu, Chengdu, China.
The Fourth People's Hospital · CNChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNDalian Medical University · CNFourth People's Hospital of Sichuan Province · CNShantou University Mental Health Center · CNZhongshan People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Patient-initiated hospital violence is a global problem which threatens the safety of health professionals and is indicative of doctor-patient tensions, impeding health system quality and access. The current study aimed to improve the understanding of medical workplace violence (WPV) in China, using authoritative and nationally representative judgment records, and to approach violence prevention strategies. Methods: All litigation records relating to violence against health professionals between 2013 and 2021 were extracted from the China Judgment Online System. Basic case information, victim characteristics, perpetrator characteristics and the nature of the violence were collated. The relationship between different treatment outcomes and violence was also explored. Results: Numbers of cases of hospital violence gradually increased from 2013 to a peak in 2016 before gradually decreasing in the following years. The most common perpetrators were patients' relatives (58.2%), followed by patients themselves (38.2%). Only 9 perpetrators had a confirmed history of mental illness and only two were intoxicated with alcohol. More than half of the cases (52.5%) occurred in rural areas and this percentage is even greater for primary health care institutions (71.4%) and secondary hospitals (73.5%). On a departmental level, the highest incidence of medical WPV was found in the emergency (18.9%), pediatrics (13.2%) and obstetrics (11.5%) departments. Violent behaviors, such as stalking, mass occupation of the ward and sharp instrument injury were significantly related to cases not involving patient death ( Conclusions: A comprehensive overview of medical WPV in China is presented and may have utility for the formulation of prevention strategies.

Indexed as

CriminalsWorkplace ViolenceChildChinaHealth PersonnelHumansJudgmentcriminal judgment recordhealth policyhealth professionalshospital violenceoccupational safetyworkplace violence

Identifiers

PMID36339236
PMCPMC9627169
OpenAlexW4306842440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.