Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36339227›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Impact of farmer professional cooperative on safety production behavior in terms of quality and safety of agricultural products.

Yun Teng, Xinlin Chen, Mei Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yun TengSchool of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Xinlin ChenSchool of Engineering, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.
Mei ZhangSchool of Economics and Management, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

"How to realize farmers to actively produce quality and safety agricultural products" has become a common problem faced by researchers and practitioners. Based on the Triadic Reciprocal Determinism theory and Behavior-motivation theory, the study tries to answer this question from the perspective of standardized farmer professional cooperatives in China, and then solve relevant international problems. The empirical results of 767 sample data using SPSS-AMOS methods show that the restraint factors of standardized farmer professional cooperative have positive effects on safety negative behavior and negative impact on safety positive behavior, and the motivation factors of standardized farmer professional cooperatives have positive effects on safety positive behavior. The restraint factors of farmer professional cooperatives have a positive impact on safety controlled motivation and negative impact on safety autonomous motivation, and the motivation factors of farmer professional cooperatives positively affect the safety autonomous motivation. The safety controlled motivation positively affects safety negative behavior and safety autonomous motivation negatively affects safety negative behavior and positively impacts on safety positive behavior. The above findings theoretically make a useful supplement to the study of farmers' safety production behavior, and have guiding significance to the construction of standardized farmer professional cooperatives in the world.

Indexed as

AgricultureFarmersChinaHealth BehaviorHumansMotivationagriculture green developmentquality and safety of agricultural productssafety motivationsafety production behaviorstandardized farmer professional cooperative

Identifiers

PMID36339227
PMCPMC9626523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.