Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36339213›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Assessment of primary care physicians' knowledge of chronic kidney disease in Poland.

Alicja Jazienicka-Kiełb, Mateusz Babicki, Magdalena Krajewska, Andrzej Oko, Karolina Kłoda, Agnieszka Mastalerz-Migas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Patient Education in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Position Statement of the Polish Society of Nephrology.International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Alicja Jazienicka-KiełbDepartment of Family Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Mateusz BabickiDepartment of Family Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Magdalena KrajewskaDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Andrzej OkoDepartment of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Diseases, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Karolina KłodaMEDFIT KAROLINA KŁODA, Szczecin, Poland.
Agnieszka Mastalerz-MigasDepartment of Family Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland.
Wroclaw Medical University · PLMeditest · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects 10-15% of the adult population worldwide and is a major societal problem. A latent course of the disease and little alarming, gradually increasing symptoms usually do not cause concern in patients and diagnostic vigilance in physicians. CKD is most often diagnosed in its end-stage when treatment options are extremely limited. This study aims to assess the knowledge of CKD among primary care physicians (PCPs) in Poland. A CAWI survey was conducted based on an authors' own questionnaire that consisted of two parts. The first part concerned patients' socioeconomic data while the second part consisted of nine single- and multiple-choice questions assessing knowledge of the criterion for diagnosis, risk factors, diagnostic evaluation, and course of CKD. A total of 610 physicians took part in the survey, including 502 (82.3%) who fully completed the questionnaire. Women accounted for 83.1% of the study group. The mean age of the study group was 37.4 ± 10.1 years. Specialists or resident physicians in family medicine accounted for 79.9% of respondents and 93.8% of physicians are those who mainly work in primary care settings. In the knowledge test, the mean score obtained by physicians was 6.5 ± 1.3 out of possible 9, with only 2.4% of respondents answering all questions correctly. According to the survey, 78.4% of respondents correctly indicated the criterion for the diagnosis of CKD, while only 68.9% identified a test for increased urinary albumin loss as the one of the greatest diagnostic values in the early stages of CKD. More than half, 63.1%, of physicians selected the correct set of answers in the multiple-choice question regarding CKD risk factors. Despite a fairly high level of knowledge among family medicine physicians regarding the causes, risk factors and course of CKD, there is a need for further education and an increase in the factual information held by this professional group, especially that the vast majority of PCPs declare a desire to expand their knowledge and believe that this will help them in their daily clinical practice.

Indexed as

Physicians, Primary CareRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPolandPractice Patterns, Physicians'Surveys and Questionnaireschronic kidney disease (CKD)family medicinegeneral practiceknowledgephysicians

Identifiers

PMID36339213
PMCPMC9631929
OpenAlexW4306871130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.