ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2022
Optimizing interactions to protein binding sites by integrating docking-scoring strategies into generative AI methods.
Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Cellular mechanical memory: a potential tool for mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- In Silico Conotoxin Studies: Progress and Prospects.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Optimal Molecular Design: Generative Active Learning Combining REINVENT with Precise Binding Free Energy Ranking Simulations.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Exploring Scoring Function Space: Developing Computational Models for Drug Discovery.Current medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The identification and optimization of promising lead molecules is essential for drug discovery. Recently, artificial intelligence (AI) based generative methods provided complementary approaches for generating molecules under specific design constraints of relevance in drug design. The goal of our study is to incorporate protein 3D information directly into generative design by flexible docking plus an adapted protein-ligand scoring function, thereby moving towards automated structure-based design. First, the protein-ligand scoring function RFXscore integrating individual scoring terms, ligand descriptors, and combined terms was derived using the PDBbind database and internal data. Next, design results for different workflows are compared to solely ligand-based reward schemes. Our newly proposed, optimal workflow for structure-based generative design is shown to produce promising results, especially for those exploration scenarios, where diverse structures fitting to a protein binding site are requested. Best results are obtained using docking followed by RFXscore, while, depending on the exact application scenario, it was also found useful to combine this approach with other metrics that bias structure generation into "drug-like" chemical space, such as target-activity machine learning models, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.